SCOPE-RL: Optimizing Reasoning Paths Before and After Success
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) optimizes LLMs using sparse verifiable final-answer rewards. This sparse anchor reliably verifies whether a trajectory succeeds but provides no direct feedback on the reasoning path that produced it. Before success, prerequisite progress on hard problems receives no reward signal; after success, outcome rewards cannot distinguish well-organized correct trajectories from redundant or locally flawed ones. We introduce SCOPE-RL (Scaffolded Chain Optimization with Process Efficiency), a two-stage framework that densifies this anchor while retaining the GRPO update: Adaptive Scaffolded RL adds prefix-decomposed verifiable rewards on answer-hidden sub-question chains before success, and Quality-Aware Process RL applies correctness-gated process-shape rewards to refine correct trajectories after success. An expert-validated Step-Quality Evaluation Protocol evaluates useful-step density, error localization, and token efficiency beyond final-answer accuracy. On Qwen3-8B-Instruct trained on DAPO-Math and Big-Math, SCOPE-RL improves average accuracy by up to 11.2 pp and reduces reasoning tokens by up to 27.1% over outcome-only GRPO; the gains hold under GSPO and on Qwen3-0.6B-Instruct, indicating that reward-signal densification is complementary to policy-update-level RLVR advances. Code and data are available at https://github.com/tokencraft-lab/SCOPE-RL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 18
Same direction, newest first
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps8 Feb
- 2026Self-Hinting Language Models Enhance Reinforcement Learning3 Feb
- 2026POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Exploration26 Jan
- 2026Future-KL Regularized GRPO: Process-Level Credit Assignment from f-Divergence Regularization15 Jan
- 2025Reasoning Curriculum: Bootstrapping Broad LLM Reasoning from Math30 Oct
- 2025EvoCoT: Overcoming the Exploration Bottleneck in Reinforcement Learning11 Aug
- 2025StepHint: Multi-level Stepwise Hints Enhance Reinforcement Learning to Reason3 Jul
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions9 Jun
- 2025Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM Reasoning7 Jun
- 2025Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoning21 Apr
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance21 Apr
- 2025Efficient Reinforcement Finetuning via Adaptive Curriculum Learning7 Apr
6 more
- 2025Online Difficulty Filtering for Reasoning Oriented Reinforcement Learning4 Apr
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Models24 Feb
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
Other references · 10
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
- 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
- 2025LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decompositioncited by 25
- 2026When More Thinking Hurts: Overthinking in LLM Test-Time Compute Scalingcited by 16
- 2025SmartThinker: Learning to Compress and Preserve Reasoning by Step-Level Length Controlcited by 7
- 2026Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026PRIME: A Process-Outcome Alignment Benchmark for Verifiable Reasoning in Mathematics and Engineeringcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Lexicographic Multi-Objective On-Policy Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Lexicographic Multi-Objective On-Policy Distillation1 Oct 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
- 2026Step Potential Advantage Estimation: Harnessing Intermediate Confidence and Correctness for Efficient Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026Re2: Unlocking LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Re-solving
- 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origin
- 2026Prioritizing the Best: Incentivizing Reliable Multimodal Reasoning by Rewarding Beyond Answer Correctness