mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Real-Time Rulebook-Aware Nonlinear MPC for Autonomous Driving with Priority-Biased Tiered Slacks

arXiv 2607.10975 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2026cs.RO math.OCcited by 0

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous-vehicle motion planners must resolve conflicts among safety, regulation, comfort, and efficiency in real time while exposing those decisions for audit. We present W-SQP, a weighted tiered-slack nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) that compiles nine driving-rule families into a four-tier shared-slack nonlinear program solved online with CasADi and IPOPT; the name denotes the weighted quadratic slack penalty, not a sequential-quadratic-programming solver. Strongly separated tier penalties bias residual violations toward lower-priority rules while leaving actuation bounds hard. The controller replans from its executed state at 10,Hz and records per-rule residuals on every cycle. A 90,ms solver-time limit returns an anytime iterate that is projected through the vehicle dynamics before execution; median and maximum observed wall-clock solve times were 28 and 104,ms. We evaluate W-SQP in closed loop on 150 Waymo Open Motion Dataset scenarios in Waymax against reactive and proposal-and-select baselines, and introduce a log-independent protocol that separates safety and regulatory compliance from resemblance to the recorded human trajectory. Under this protocol, W-SQP shows no systematic group-level deficit relative to expert replay on the log-independent safety and regulatory rules, with several localized regressions in the hardest, highest-divergence scenarios. The results characterize W-SQP as an auditable, priority-biased, anytime-capable NMPC prototype rather than a hard-real-time or formally safe controller.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
  2. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
  3. 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 372
  4. 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 288
  5. 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
  6. 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 242
  7. 2023Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Researchcited by 160
  8. 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 149
  9. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
  10. 2019Liability, Ethics, and Culture-Aware Behavior Specification using Rulebookscited by 43
  11. 2020Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordinationcited by 38
  12. 2023Rethinking Imitation-based Planner for Autonomous Drivingcited by 25
9 more
  1. 2021Rule-based Optimal Control for Autonomous Drivingcited by 21
  2. 2026CLOVER: Closed-Loop Value Estimation and Ranking for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Planningcited by 11
  3. 2021Safety of the Intended Driving Behavior Using Rulebookscited by 9
  4. 2025When Planners Meet Reality: How Learned, Reactive Traffic Agents Shift nuPlan Benchmarkscited by 7
  5. 2022Responsibility-Sensitive Safety: an Introduction with an Eye to Logical Foundations and Formalizationcited by 6
  6. 2025nuPlan-R: A Closed-Loop Planning Benchmark for Autonomous Driving via Reactive Multi-Agent Simulationcited by 4
  7. 2024Real-time MPC with Control Barrier Functions for Autonomous Driving using Safety Enhanced Collocationcited by 3
  8. 2024IGDrivSim: A Benchmark for the Imitation Gap in Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
  9. 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Model Predictive Inferential Control of Neural State-Space Models for Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning
  2. 2021NMPC trajectory planner for urban autonomous driving
  3. 2023R2NMPC: A Real-Time Reduced Robustified Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets for Autonomous Vehicle Motion Control
  4. 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline
  5. 2026Stability-Aware Imitation Learning from Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicle Lateral Control: Exact Q-Loss and a Novel Training Procedure
  6. 2026Efficient Hybrid Hard--Soft Signal Temporal Logic MPC for Driving under Multimodal Uncertainty
  7. 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictions
  8. 2026A Hybrid End-to-End and Modular Control Architecture Toward Safe Vehicle Lateral Control: Combining Soft Actor-Critic with Model Predictive Control