Real-Time Rulebook-Aware Nonlinear MPC for Autonomous Driving with Priority-Biased Tiered Slacks
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous-vehicle motion planners must resolve conflicts among safety, regulation, comfort, and efficiency in real time while exposing those decisions for audit. We present W-SQP, a weighted tiered-slack nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) that compiles nine driving-rule families into a four-tier shared-slack nonlinear program solved online with CasADi and IPOPT; the name denotes the weighted quadratic slack penalty, not a sequential-quadratic-programming solver. Strongly separated tier penalties bias residual violations toward lower-priority rules while leaving actuation bounds hard. The controller replans from its executed state at 10,Hz and records per-rule residuals on every cycle. A 90,ms solver-time limit returns an anytime iterate that is projected through the vehicle dynamics before execution; median and maximum observed wall-clock solve times were 28 and 104,ms. We evaluate W-SQP in closed loop on 150 Waymo Open Motion Dataset scenarios in Waymax against reactive and proposal-and-select baselines, and introduce a log-independent protocol that separates safety and regulatory compliance from resemblance to the recorded human trajectory. Under this protocol, W-SQP shows no systematic group-level deficit relative to expert replay on the log-independent safety and regulatory rules, with several localized regressions in the hardest, highest-divergence scenarios. The results characterize W-SQP as an auditable, priority-biased, anytime-capable NMPC prototype rather than a hard-real-time or formally safe controller.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.
Builds on
21 of 37 references.
References · 21
- 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 537
- 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 372
- 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 288
- 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
- 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 242
- 2023Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Researchcited by 160
- 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 149
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
- 2019Liability, Ethics, and Culture-Aware Behavior Specification using Rulebookscited by 43
- 2020Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordinationcited by 38
- 2023Rethinking Imitation-based Planner for Autonomous Drivingcited by 25
9 more
- 2021Rule-based Optimal Control for Autonomous Drivingcited by 21
- 2026CLOVER: Closed-Loop Value Estimation and Ranking for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Planningcited by 11
- 2021Safety of the Intended Driving Behavior Using Rulebookscited by 9
- 2025When Planners Meet Reality: How Learned, Reactive Traffic Agents Shift nuPlan Benchmarkscited by 7
- 2022Responsibility-Sensitive Safety: an Introduction with an Eye to Logical Foundations and Formalizationcited by 6
- 2025nuPlan-R: A Closed-Loop Planning Benchmark for Autonomous Driving via Reactive Multi-Agent Simulationcited by 4
- 2024Real-time MPC with Control Barrier Functions for Autonomous Driving using Safety Enhanced Collocationcited by 3
- 2024IGDrivSim: A Benchmark for the Imitation Gap in Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
- 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysiscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Model Predictive Inferential Control of Neural State-Space Models for Autonomous Vehicle Motion Planning
- 2021NMPC trajectory planner for urban autonomous driving
- 2023R2NMPC: A Real-Time Reduced Robustified Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets for Autonomous Vehicle Motion Control
- 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline
- 2026Stability-Aware Imitation Learning from Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicle Lateral Control: Exact Q-Loss and a Novel Training Procedure
- 2026Efficient Hybrid Hard--Soft Signal Temporal Logic MPC for Driving under Multimodal Uncertainty
- 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictions
- 2026A Hybrid End-to-End and Modular Control Architecture Toward Safe Vehicle Lateral Control: Combining Soft Actor-Critic with Model Predictive Control