mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-seed explainability using Procrustes-conditioned Joint End-to-end Top-K Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2607.08499 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a Procrustes-conditioned Joint End-to-end Top-K Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) for extracting cross-seed universal features from independently trained BERT models. Cross-seed feature universality is a fundamental challenge in mechanistic interpretability: because dictionary learning is non-convex, independently trained networks learn misaligned feature spaces, so apparently identical features may differ by random initialization. We address this by computing an orthogonal Procrustes rotation between seeds' activation spaces before joint SAE training, combining Top-K sparsity, end-to-end downstream optimization, and an auxiliary dead-feature revival loss based on previous SAE literature. Evaluating on five independent seed pairs (ten BERT models) across three benchmark datasets (SST-2, Stanford Politeness, TweetEval Emotion), our full pipeline produces more universal features (Pearson r ≥ 0.70 across seeds) than post-hoc alignment baselines on all three datasets. A minimal qualitative analysis confirms that high-universality features encode interpretable sociolinguistic patterns.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models7 Mar
  2. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  3. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 106
  2. 2021Similarity and Matching of Neural Network Representationscited by 78
  3. 2024Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 67
  4. 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
  5. 2022Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERTcited by 56
  6. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
  7. 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
  8. 2025InstaSHAP: Interpretable Additive Models Explain Shapley Values Instantlycited by 9
  9. 2025Atlas-Alignment: Making Interpretability Transferable Across Language Modelscited by 3
  10. 2025Feature Integration Spaces: Joint Training Reveals Dual Encoding in Neural Network Representationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features
  2. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features
  3. 2026Descriptive Collision in Sparse Autoencoder Auto-Interpretability: When One Explanation Describes Many Features
  4. 2026C2R: Cross-sample Consistency Regularization Mitigates Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders
  5. 2026Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
  6. 2026How Pruning Reshapes Features: Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Weight-Pruned Language Models
  7. 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
  8. 2025Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEs