C2R: Cross-sample Consistency Regularization Mitigates Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to interpret large language models by decomposing activations into sparse, human-understandable features, but scaling to large dictionaries exposes fundamental challenges. Systematic studies reveal pervasive feature splitting that fragments coherent concepts into non-atomic latents and widespread feature absorption that creates arbitrary exceptions in general features, severely compromising latent reliability. These issues stem from inconsistent latent assignment across samples: without cross-sample constraints, per-sample optimization often allows a single underlying concept to be inconsistently distributed across multiple redundant or interfering latents. To address this, we introduce C2R (underlineCross-sample underlineConsistency underlineRegularization). C2R explicitly encourages that each semantic feature is consistently represented by a unified latent across the batch by penalizing the co-activation of directionally similar latents. Comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that C2R effectively mitigates both splitting and absorption while, crucially, preserving reconstruction fidelity, providing a principled solution that enhances latent interpretability without degrading model performance. Source code is available at https://github.com/hr-jin/Cross-sample-Consistency-Regularization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Resa: Transparent Reasoning Models via SAEs11 Jun
- 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders9 Oct
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders22 Sep
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr
Other references · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders
- 2026Subspace-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Effective Mechanistic Interpretability
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
- 2025Beyond Redundancy: Diverse and Specialized Multi-Expert Sparse Autoencoder
- 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
- 2026Semantic Optimal Transport for Sparse Autoencoder Feature Matching and Circuit Compression