mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

C2R: Cross-sample Consistency Regularization Mitigates Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2606.30609 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to interpret large language models by decomposing activations into sparse, human-understandable features, but scaling to large dictionaries exposes fundamental challenges. Systematic studies reveal pervasive feature splitting that fragments coherent concepts into non-atomic latents and widespread feature absorption that creates arbitrary exceptions in general features, severely compromising latent reliability. These issues stem from inconsistent latent assignment across samples: without cross-sample constraints, per-sample optimization often allows a single underlying concept to be inconsistently distributed across multiple redundant or interfering latents. To address this, we introduce C2R (underlineCross-sample underlineConsistency underlineRegularization). C2R explicitly encourages that each semantic feature is consistently represented by a unified latent across the batch by penalizing the co-activation of directionally similar latents. Comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that C2R effectively mitigates both splitting and absorption while, crucially, preserving reconstruction fidelity, providing a principled solution that enhances latent interpretability without degrading model performance. Source code is available at https://github.com/hr-jin/Cross-sample-Consistency-Regularization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Resa: Transparent Reasoning Models via SAEs11 Jun
  2. 2024Quantifying Feature Space Universality Across Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders9 Oct
  3. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoders22 Sep
  4. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  5. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr

Other references · 3

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  2. 2025Understanding Refusal in Language Models with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 29
  3. 2025OrtSAE: Orthogonal Sparse Autoencoders Uncover Atomic Featurescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features
  2. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders
  3. 2026Subspace-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Effective Mechanistic Interpretability
  4. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
  5. 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
  6. 2025Beyond Redundancy: Diverse and Specialized Multi-Expert Sparse Autoencoder
  7. 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
  8. 2026Semantic Optimal Transport for Sparse Autoencoder Feature Matching and Circuit Compression