FedCVESA: Taking Away Training Data in Federated Learning via Correlation Value Encoding and Segmented Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse the memorization capacity of deep models to store and later recover training data. However, this memorization-based threat has not been systematically studied under FL environments, where multi-client averaging could overwrite encoded training data. In this paper, we study a white-box TATD attack in which a malicious server selects n target clients from K participating clients and actively writes private training data into the global model during federated training. We propose FedCVESA, a federated variant of Correlation Value Encoding Attack (CVEA), by adding a Pearson-correlation regularizer to the loss function of target clients, so that private training data are gradually encoded into selected model parameters, referred to as carrier parameters. To reduce the overwriting of carrier parameters during server aggregation, we further propose segmented aggregation over dispersed carrier parameters, preserving selected carrier parameters while keeping standard averaging on the remaining parameters. Experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 under Dirichlet non-IID partitions show that the proposed method can steal semantically meaningful private training images from the trained model while maintaining acceptable main-task utility in a controlled proof-of-concept setting. These results demonstrate that FL can become a parameter-level memorization channel for active TATD attack under the studied white-box malicious-server setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 45 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
18 more
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
- 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 169
- 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
- 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
- 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
- 2022Neurotoxin: Durable Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 98
- 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 73
- 2022Cocktail Party Attack: Breaking Aggregation-Based Privacy in Federated Learning using Independent Component Analysiscited by 29
- 2022TabLeak: Tabular Data Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 13
- 2023SRATTA : Sample Re-ATTribution Attack of Secure Aggregation in Federated Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.