mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TabLeak: Tabular Data Leakage in Federated Learning

arXiv 2210.01785 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.DCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While federated learning (FL) promises to preserve privacy, recent works in the image and text domains have shown that training updates leak private client data. However, most high-stakes applications of FL (e.g., in healthcare and finance) use tabular data, where the risk of data leakage has not yet been explored. A successful attack for tabular data must address two key challenges unique to the domain: (i) obtaining a solution to a high-variance mixed discrete-continuous optimization problem, and (ii) enabling human assessment of the reconstruction as unlike for image and text data, direct human inspection is not possible. In this work we address these challenges and propose TabLeak, the first comprehensive reconstruction attack on tabular data. TabLeak is based on two key contributions: (i) a method which leverages a softmax relaxation and pooled ensembling to solve the optimization problem, and (ii) an entropy-based uncertainty quantification scheme to enable human assessment. We evaluate TabLeak on four tabular datasets for both FedSGD and FedAvg training protocols, and show that it successfully breaks several settings previously deemed safe. For instance, we extract large subsets of private data at >90% accuracy even at the large batch size of 128. Our findings demonstrate that current high-stakes tabular FL is excessively vulnerable to leakage attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2022.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  5. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  6. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 625
  7. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  8. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  9. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  10. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
  11. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  12. 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 138
12 more
  1. 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 106
  2. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
  3. 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 95
  4. 2021CAFE: Catastrophic Data Leakage in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 76
  5. 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 72
  6. 2022Recovering Private Text in Federated Learning of Language Modelscited by 67
  7. 2020A Framework for Evaluating Gradient Leakage Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 63
  8. 2021TAG: Gradient Attack on Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 63
  9. 2022LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model Priorscited by 52
  10. 2021Towards General Deep Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 40
  11. 2021Bayesian Framework for Gradient Leakagecited by 34
  12. 2022Data Leakage in Federated Averagingcited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: