Toward Trustworthy Large Language Model Agents in Healthcare
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Healthcare appointment scheduling remains a persistent operational bottleneck, driven by manual coordination, fragmented legacy systems, and high administrative overhead. These inefficiencies constrain provider availability and degrade patient access to care. This paper presents CareConnect, a safety-first conversational agent for healthcare logistics automation that leverages large language model (LLM) function calling, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and layered deterministic safety guardrails. The system orchestrates eight domain-specific tools to support appointment booking, modification, cancellation, and facility information retrieval, while enforcing strict scope constraints that prohibit medical advice or diagnosis. Safety-critical situations are handled through deterministic short-circuit mechanisms for emergency detection and medical intent refusal. We evaluate CareConnect on a comprehensive benchmark of 680 task-oriented scenarios spanning end-to-end workflows, multi-turn interactions, and edge cases. Experimental results demonstrate a 91.8% task completion rate with a median per-request latency of 2.2 seconds, 96.0% safety compliance on the dedicated safety-critical evaluation subset, and an average operational cost of 0.0324 per appointment, yielding a significant cost reduction compared to manual human scheduling. These findings show that carefully scoped and rigorously safeguarded LLM-based agents can reliably automate complex healthcare operational workflows while maintaining safety guarantees and achieving substantial cost efficiency. The source code and system implementation are publicly available at https://github.com/Hadi-Hsn/CareConnect.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.
Builds on
9 of 24 references.
References · 9
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2024Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicinecited by 326
- 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319
- 2025MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare Copilotcited by 83
- 2023Foundation Metrics for Evaluating Effectiveness of Healthcare Conversations Powered by Generative AIcited by 32
- 2023Human-Robot Interaction using VAHR: Virtual Assistant, Human, and Robots in the Loopcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Balancing Safety and Helpfulness in Healthcare AI Assistants through Iterative Preference Alignment
- 2024Ensuring Safety and Trust: Analyzing the Risks of Large Language Models in Medicine
- 2025Tiered Agentic Oversight: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Healthcare Safety
- 2026CareGuardAI: Context-Aware Multi-Agent Guardrails for Clinical Safety & Hallucination Mitigation in Patient-Facing LLMs
- 2026ECHO: A Locally-Deployable Agentic Health Assistant with Temporal Memory, Safety Guardrails, and Speech Assessment
- 2026When OpenClaw Meets Hospital: Toward an Agentic Operating System for Dynamic Clinical Workflows
- 2025MedicalOS: An LLM Agent based Operating System for Digital Healthcare
- 2026A prospective clinical feasibility study of a conversational diagnostic AI in an ambulatory primary care clinic