mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Trustworthy Large Language Model Agents in Healthcare

arXiv 2607.05055 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Healthcare appointment scheduling remains a persistent operational bottleneck, driven by manual coordination, fragmented legacy systems, and high administrative overhead. These inefficiencies constrain provider availability and degrade patient access to care. This paper presents CareConnect, a safety-first conversational agent for healthcare logistics automation that leverages large language model (LLM) function calling, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and layered deterministic safety guardrails. The system orchestrates eight domain-specific tools to support appointment booking, modification, cancellation, and facility information retrieval, while enforcing strict scope constraints that prohibit medical advice or diagnosis. Safety-critical situations are handled through deterministic short-circuit mechanisms for emergency detection and medical intent refusal. We evaluate CareConnect on a comprehensive benchmark of 680 task-oriented scenarios spanning end-to-end workflows, multi-turn interactions, and edge cases. Experimental results demonstrate a 91.8% task completion rate with a median per-request latency of 2.2 seconds, 96.0% safety compliance on the dedicated safety-critical evaluation subset, and an average operational cost of 0.0324 per appointment, yielding a significant cost reduction compared to manual human scheduling. These findings show that carefully scoped and rigorously safeguarded LLM-based agents can reliably automate complex healthcare operational workflows while maintaining safety guarantees and achieving substantial cost efficiency. The source code and system implementation are publicly available at https://github.com/Hadi-Hsn/CareConnect.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 24 references.

References · 9

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  4. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  5. 2024Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicinecited by 326
  6. 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319
  7. 2025MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare Copilotcited by 83
  8. 2023Foundation Metrics for Evaluating Effectiveness of Healthcare Conversations Powered by Generative AIcited by 32
  9. 2023Human-Robot Interaction using VAHR: Virtual Assistant, Human, and Robots in the Loopcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Balancing Safety and Helpfulness in Healthcare AI Assistants through Iterative Preference Alignment
  2. 2024Ensuring Safety and Trust: Analyzing the Risks of Large Language Models in Medicine
  3. 2025Tiered Agentic Oversight: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent System for Healthcare Safety
  4. 2026CareGuardAI: Context-Aware Multi-Agent Guardrails for Clinical Safety & Hallucination Mitigation in Patient-Facing LLMs
  5. 2026ECHO: A Locally-Deployable Agentic Health Assistant with Temporal Memory, Safety Guardrails, and Speech Assessment
  6. 2026When OpenClaw Meets Hospital: Toward an Agentic Operating System for Dynamic Clinical Workflows
  7. 2025MedicalOS: An LLM Agent based Operating System for Digital Healthcare
  8. 2026A prospective clinical feasibility study of a conversational diagnostic AI in an ambulatory primary care clinic