mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CareGuardAI: Context-Aware Multi-Agent Guardrails for Clinical Safety & Hallucination Mitigation in Patient-Facing LLMs

arXiv 2604.26959 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Integrating large language models (LLMs) into patient-facing healthcare systems offers significant potential to improve access to medical information. However, ensuring clinical safety and factual reliability remains a critical challenge. In practice, AI-generated responses may be conditionally correct yet medically inappropriate, as models often fail to interpret patient context and tend to produce agreeable responses rather than challenge unsafe assumptions. Unlike clinicians, who infer risk from incomplete information, LLMs frequently lack contextual awareness. Moreover, real-world patient interactions are open-ended and underspecified, unlike structured benchmark settings. We present CareGuardAI, a risk-aware safety framework for patient-facing medical question answering that addresses two key failure modes: clinical safety risk and hallucination risk. The framework introduces Clinical Safety Risk Assessment (SRA), inspired by ISO 14971, and Hallucination Risk Assessment (HRA) to evaluate medical risk and factual reliability. At inference time, CareGuardAI employs a multi-stage pipeline consisting of a controller agent, safety-constrained generation, and dual risk evaluation, followed by iterative refinement when necessary. Responses are released only when both SRA and HRA are less than or equal to 2, ensuring clinically acceptable outputs with bounded latency. We evaluate CareGuardAI on PatientSafeBench, MedSafetyBench, and MedHallu, covering both safety and hallucination detection. Across these benchmarks, the framework consistently outperforms strong baseline models, including GPT-4o-mini, demonstrating the importance of context-aware, risk-based, inference-time safety mechanisms for reliable deployment in healthcare.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

8 of 15 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  2. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  3. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  4. 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decodingcited by 247
  5. 2024MedSafetyBench: Evaluating and Improving the Medical Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 44
  6. 2025MedHallu: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Detecting Medical Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 34
  7. 2024From Loops to Oops: Fallback Behaviors of Language Models Under Uncertaintycited by 14
  8. 2026HalluGuard: Demystifying Data-Driven and Reasoning-Driven Hallucinations in LLMscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Ensuring Safety and Trust: Analyzing the Risks of Large Language Models in Medicine
  2. 2024The Need for Guardrails with Large Language Models in Medical Safety-Critical Settings: An Artificial Intelligence Application in the Pharmacovigilance Ecosystem
  3. 2025CARES: Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety and Adversarial Robustness in Medical LLMs
  4. 2026JMedEthicBench: A Multi-Turn Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Safety in Japanese Large Language Models
  5. 2025Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions
  6. 2026When Medical Safety Alignment Fails: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on High-Risk Medical Queries
  7. 2025Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric Survey
  8. 2026Med-HEAL: Analyzing and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical LLMs with Hallucination-Aware In-Context Learning