mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ensuring Safety and Trust: Analyzing the Risks of Large Language Models in Medicine

arXiv 2411.14487 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) make them increasingly compelling for adoption in real-world healthcare applications. However, the risks associated with using LLMs in medical applications have not been systematically characterized. We propose using five key principles for safe and trustworthy medical AI: Truthfulness, Resilience, Fairness, Robustness, and Privacy, along with ten specific aspects. Under this comprehensive framework, we introduce a novel MedGuard benchmark with 1,000 expert-verified questions. Our evaluation of 11 commonly used LLMs shows that the current language models, regardless of their safety alignment mechanisms, generally perform poorly on most of our benchmarks, particularly when compared to the high performance of human physicians. Despite recent reports indicate that advanced LLMs like ChatGPT can match or even exceed human performance in various medical tasks, this study underscores a significant safety gap, highlighting the crucial need for human oversight and the implementation of AI safety guardrails.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Medical Safety Alignment Fails: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on High-Risk Medical Queries
  2. 2025Towards Safe AI Clinicians: A Comprehensive Study on Large Language Model Jailbreaking in Healthcare
  3. 2025The Forgotten Shield: Safety Grafting in Parameter-Space for Medical MLLMs
  4. 2026Improving the Safety and Trustworthiness of Medical AI via Multi-Agent Evaluation Loops
  5. 2025Beyond the Leaderboard: Rethinking Medical Benchmarks for Large Language Models
  6. 2026CareGuardAI: Context-Aware Multi-Agent Guardrails for Clinical Safety & Hallucination Mitigation in Patient-Facing LLMs
  7. 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey
  8. 2025Balancing Safety and Helpfulness in Healthcare AI Assistants through Iterative Preference Alignment