Probing Identity-Specific Motion Signatures: A Controlled Diagnostic Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identity recognition (e.g., person, animal re-identification) has traditionally relied heavily on static appearance cues. Yet motion--consistent, individual-specific dynamics--can provide a complementary and potentially more robust signature, especially when appearance is weak or variable. This raises a fundamental question: when identity-specific motion cues are clearly present, to what extent do modern video models use them for recognition? To investigate this question, we conduct a systematic diagnostic study and introduce BALLER120, a controlled benchmark of 120 professional basketball players performing free-throws. By focusing on the same multi-phase action across individuals, BALLER120 reduces action-level variation and identity-correlated acquisition biases, enabling fine-grained analysis of identity-specific kinematic patterns. We find that modern video models can predict identity accurately from RGB videos, but often rely on static appearance cues such as faces and jersey regions, even when informative motion cues are available. Strikingly, when appearance is suppressed through silhouette-only or skeleton-only inputs, the same model architectures shift toward motion micro-patterns (e.g., foot placement and elbow bending). Despite containing less visual information, appearance-suppressed representations achieve competitive accuracy and stronger robustness to appearance shifts. Our qualitative analyses further show that appearance-suppressed models attend to distinctive motion patterns across individuals. Overall, our study demonstrates that identity-specific motion signatures are present, informative, and learnable, but modern video models may overlook them in favor of easier static shortcuts unless appearance cues are explicitly suppressed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
38 of 55 references.
References · 38
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
26 more
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
- 2020Deep Learning for Person Re-identification: A Survey and Outlookcited by 549
- 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
- 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
- 2017Person Transfer GAN to Bridge Domain Gap for Person Re-Identificationcited by 480
- 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 333
- 2019A Short Note on the Kinetics-700 Human Action Datasetcited by 310
- 2018Moments in Time Dataset: one million videos for event understandingcited by 215
- 2025InternVideo2.5: Empowering Video MLLMs with Long and Rich Context Modelingcited by 211
- 2023RTMPose: Real-Time Multi-Person Pose Estimation based on MMPosecited by 175
- 2016Person Re-identification in the Wildcited by 157
- 2021Fine-Grained Image Analysis with Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 135
- 2022Gait Recognition in the Wild with Dense 3D Representations and A Benchmarkcited by 114
- 2022Clothes-Changing Person Re-identification with RGB Modality Onlycited by 98
- 2020Person Re-identification by Contour Sketch under Moderate Clothing Changecited by 91
- 2020Long-Term Cloth-Changing Person Re-identificationcited by 85
- 2018Past, Present, and Future Approaches Using Computer Vision for Animal Re-Identification from Camera Trap Datacited by 46
- 2023Exploring Deep Models for Practical Gait Recognitioncited by 46
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Gait Recognition: Algorithms, Datasets and Challengescited by 45
- 2024BigGait: Learning Gait Representation You Want by Large Vision Modelscited by 45
- 2023DyGait: Exploiting Dynamic Representations for High-performance Gait Recognitioncited by 35
- 2022Gait Recognition in the Wild with Multi-hop Temporal Switchcited by 22
- 2022Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 21
- 2022MEVID: Multi-view Extended Videos with Identities for Video Person Re-Identificationcited by 16
- 2025Finer-CAM: Spotting the Difference Reveals Finer Details for Visual Explanationcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.