mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Securing Multi-Tool AI Agent Chains With Dynamic, Real-Time Compositional Policies

arXiv 2607.03423 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Modern AI agent implementations such as frontier coding agents chain multiple tools at runtime that create a security surface that per-tool guardrails are unable to address, as individually permitted tools can violate organizational policies when composed. We propose the Dynamic Security Control Compositor (DSCC), a two-phase approach to compositional security for multi-tool agent chains. In Phase 1, at session checkout, a Most Restrictive Set (MRS) algorithm composes per-tool security policies into a single effective policy with a formal monotonicity invariant that extending a chain can only tighten the result, blocking incompatible combinations before any tool executes. Outputs of any tool call propagate their classification constraints into a session-level taint state, so subsequent invocations must satisfy the most restrictive constraints seen so far. In Phase 2, at runtime, the system tracks the sensitivity of data the agent touches through a monotonic taint state and revokes the session if the accumulated exposure would make a subsequent tool call a policy violation. Together, these phases provide defense in depth, where static composition prevents unsafe chains from starting, and runtime taint tracking catches violations that emerge from the specific data used. We provide a reference implementation on 32 tools governed by 16 NIST SP 800-53 aligned policies and evaluate it under two composition modes. In the default clearance mode, permitted combinations are partitioned into classification-level clusters, blocking 79.2% of policy pairs and 95.5% of triples. The alternative taint mode admits mixed-classification chains within the exfiltration boundary, blocking 42.5% and 60.5% respectively. We discuss the governance implications for organizations deploying multi-tool agents, including the utility-security tradeoff and the changes needed to operationalize chain-aware policies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

13 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026ChainFuzzer: Greybox Fuzzing for Workflow-Level Multi-Tool Vulnerabilities in LLM Agents13 Mar
  2. 2026Silent Egress: When Implicit Prompt Injection Makes LLM Agents Leak Without a Trace25 Feb
  3. 2026MCP-ITP: An Automated Framework for Implicit Tool Poisoning in MCP12 Jan
  4. 2025MCP Security Bench (MSB): Benchmarking Attacks Against Model Context Protocol in LLM Agents14 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  4. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  5. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  6. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
  7. 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Taskscited by 94
  8. 2026International AI Safety Report 2026cited by 20
  9. 2026Model Context Protocol Threat Modeling and Analyzing Vulnerabilities to Prompt Injection with Tool Poisoningcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ToolGuardian: Declarative Security for AI Agent-Tool Interactions
  2. 2026ChainCaps: Composition-Safe Tool-Using Agents via Monotonic Capability Attenuation
  3. 2026AgenTRIM: Tool Risk Mitigation for Agentic AI
  4. 2026AgentFlow: A Flow-Centric Policy Language and Framework for Securing LLM Agent Systems
  5. 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
  6. 2026Guardrails as Infrastructure: Policy-First Control for Tool-Orchestrated Workflows
  7. 2026Agentao: A Policy-Governed Runtime Harness for Embeddable Tool-Using LLM Agents
  8. 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems