mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Silent Egress: When Implicit Prompt Injection Makes LLM Agents Leak Without a Trace

arXiv 2602.22450 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic large language model systems increasingly automate tasks by retrieving URLs and calling external tools. We show that this workflow gives rise to implicit prompt injection: adversarial instructions embedded in automatically generated URL previews, including titles, metadata, and snippets, can introduce a system-level risk that we refer to as silent egress. Using a fully local and reproducible testbed, we demonstrate that a malicious web page can induce an agent to issue outbound requests that exfiltrate sensitive runtime context, even when the final response shown to the user appears harmless. In 480 experimental runs with a qwen2.5:7b-based agent, the attack succeeds with high probability (P (egress) =0.89), and 95% of successful attacks are not detected by output-based safety checks. We also introduce sharded exfiltration, where sensitive information is split across multiple requests to avoid detection. This strategy reduces single-request leakage metrics by 73% (Leak@1) and bypasses simple data loss prevention mechanisms. Our ablation results indicate that defenses applied at the prompt layer offer limited protection, while controls at the system and network layers, such as domain allowlisting and redirect-chain analysis, are considerably more effective. These findings suggest that network egress should be treated as a first-class security outcome in agentic LLM systems. We outline architectural directions, including provenance tracking and capability isolation, that go beyond prompt-level hardening.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep

Other references · 15

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  6. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  7. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  8. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  9. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  10. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  11. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  12. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
3 more
  1. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  2. 2024AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathwayscited by 122
  3. 2023Abusing Images and Sounds for Indirect Instruction Injection in Multi-Modal LLMscited by 117

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ClawGuard: A Runtime Security Framework for Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection
  2. 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis
  3. 2024Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use
  4. 2025Automating Prompt Leakage Attacks on Large Language Models Using Agentic Approach
  5. 2025RTBAS: Defending LLM Agents Against Prompt Injection and Privacy Leakage
  6. 2026Silent Failures in Agentic Security Evaluation: A Validated Harness for Tool-Call Mediation Under Indirect Prompt Injection
  7. 2026Assessing Automated Prompt Injection Attacks in Agentic Environments
  8. 2026Dive into Ambiguity: A*-Inspired Multi-Agents Commonsense Obfuscation Attack on LLM Prompts