mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Prεεmpt: Sanitizing Sensitive Prompts for LLMs

arXiv 2504.05147 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of large language models (LLMs) has introduced new privacy challenges, particularly during inference where sensitive information in prompts may be exposed to proprietary LLM APIs. In this paper, we address the problem of formally protecting the sensitive information contained in a prompt while maintaining response quality. To this end, first, we introduce a cryptographically inspired notion of a prompt sanitizer which transforms an input prompt to protect its sensitive tokens. Second, we propose Prεεmpt, a novel system that implements a prompt sanitizer. Prεεmpt categorizes sensitive tokens into two types: (1) those where the LLM's response depends solely on the format (such as SSNs, credit card numbers), for which we use format-preserving encryption (FPE); and (2) those where the response depends on specific values, (such as age, salary) for which we apply metric differential privacy (mDP). Our evaluation demonstrates that Prεεmpt is a practical method to achieve meaningful privacy guarantees, while maintaining high utility compared to unsanitized prompts, and outperforming prior methods

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

Builds on

3 of 80 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019A Survey of Optimization Methods from a Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 90
  2. 2014ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Frameworkcited by 88
  3. 2022Assessing Ranking and Effectiveness of Evolutionary Algorithm Hyperparameters Using Global Sensitivity Analysis Methodologiescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

12 papers.