Prεεmpt: Sanitizing Sensitive Prompts for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of large language models (LLMs) has introduced new privacy challenges, particularly during inference where sensitive information in prompts may be exposed to proprietary LLM APIs. In this paper, we address the problem of formally protecting the sensitive information contained in a prompt while maintaining response quality. To this end, first, we introduce a cryptographically inspired notion of a prompt sanitizer which transforms an input prompt to protect its sensitive tokens. Second, we propose Prεεmpt, a novel system that implements a prompt sanitizer. Prεεmpt categorizes sensitive tokens into two types: (1) those where the LLM's response depends solely on the format (such as SSNs, credit card numbers), for which we use format-preserving encryption (FPE); and (2) those where the response depends on specific values, (such as age, salary) for which we apply metric differential privacy (mDP). Our evaluation demonstrates that Prεεmpt is a practical method to achieve meaningful privacy guarantees, while maintaining high utility compared to unsanitized prompts, and outperforming prior methods
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.
Builds on
3 of 80 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.
12 papers.
- 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluationcited by 27
- 2025Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM Promptingcited by 8
- 2025PPMI: Privacy-Preserving LLM Interaction with Socratic Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Homomorphically Encrypted Vector Databasescited by 6
- 2025Can Large Language Models Really Recognize Your Name?cited by 4
- 2025MaskSQL: Safeguarding Privacy for LLM-Based Text-to-SQL via Abstractioncited by 3
- 2026Beyond Direct Identifiers: Probabilistic Privacy Risk Estimation for Privacy-Conscious LLM Query Delegationcited by 2
- 2026PAAC: Privacy-Aware Agentic Device-Cloud Collaborationcited by 1
- 2026Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactionscited by 1
- 2026DP-MGTD: Privacy-Preserving Machine-Generated Text Detection via Adaptive Differentially Private Entity Sanitizationcited by 0
- 2026Selective Token-Level Cryptographic Redaction for Privacy-Preserving Clinical Deployment of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscationcited by 0
- 2026PolicyGuard: Prompt-Configurable Semantic DLP for LLM Coding Agentscited by 0
- 2026Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions10 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Direct Identifiers: Probabilistic Privacy Risk Estimation for Privacy-Conscious LLM Query Delegation10 Aug 2026
- 2026PolicyGuard: Prompt-Configurable Semantic DLP for LLM Coding Agents3 Aug 2026
- 2026PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscation3 Jul 2026
- 2026Selective Token-Level Cryptographic Redaction for Privacy-Preserving Clinical Deployment of Large Language Models2 Jun 2026
- 2026PAAC: Privacy-Aware Agentic Device-Cloud Collaboration9 May 2026
- 2026DP-MGTD: Privacy-Preserving Machine-Generated Text Detection via Adaptive Differentially Private Entity Sanitization8 Jan 2026
- 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation16 Oct 2025
- 2025Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM Prompting4 Oct 2025
- 2025MaskSQL: Safeguarding Privacy for LLM-Based Text-to-SQL via Abstraction27 Sep 2025
- 2025PPMI: Privacy-Preserving LLM Interaction with Socratic Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Homomorphically Encrypted Vector Databases19 Jun 2025
- 2025Can Large Language Models Really Recognize Your Name?20 May 2025