Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central component of post-training large language models (LLMs), yet little is understood about how RL adaptation is distributed across transformer layers. Existing approaches typically update all model parameters uniformly, implicitly assuming that every layer contributes similarly to the gains obtained during RL post-training. In this work, we challenge this assumption through a systematic layer-wise study of RL training. Surprisingly, we find that training a single transformer layer can recover most of the gains achieved by full-parameter RL training, and in some cases even surpass it. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the quantity layer contribution, which measures the fraction of full RL improvement recovered by training a layer in isolation. Across seven models spanning two model families (Qwen3, Qwen2.5), three RL algorithms (GRPO, GiGPO, Dr. GRPO), and multiple task domains including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and agentic decision-making, we observe a remarkably stable pattern: RL gains are highly concentrated in a small subset of, and in many cases even a single, transformer layers. More strikingly, the same structural pattern consistently emerges: high-contribution layers concentrate in the middle of the transformer stack, while layers near the input and output ends contribute substantially less. The resulting layer rankings remain strongly correlated across datasets, tasks, model families, and RL algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
12 of 15 references.
References · 12
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
- 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
- 2024LISA: Layerwise Importance Sampling for Memory-Efficient Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 88
- 2026Neural Thickets: Diverse Task Experts Are Dense Around Pretrained Weightscited by 25
- 2024Understanding Layer Significance in LLM Alignmentcited by 19
- 2025Demystifying the Roles of LLM Layers in Retrieval, Knowledge, and Reasoningcited by 15
- 2025Layer Importance for Mathematical Reasoning is Forged in Pre-Training and Invariant after Post-Trainingcited by 9
- 2025MISA: Memory-Efficient LLMs Optimization with Module-wise Importance Samplingcited by 2
- 2025AdaGradSelect: An adaptive gradient-guided layer selection method for efficient fine-tuning of SLMscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tunes a Sparse Subnetwork in Large Language Models
- 2025Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection
- 2026Demystifying Reinforcement Learning Post-Training of Language Models
- 2025Rethinking RL Evaluation: Can Benchmarks Truly Reveal Failures of RL Methods?
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Finetunes Small Subnetworks in Large Language Models
- 2026Linear Dynamics in the RLVR Training of Large Language Models
- 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models
- 2026Learning Dynamics in RL Post-Training for Language Models