mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations

arXiv 2502.12179 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised approaches to large language model (LLM) interpretability, such as sparse autoencoders (SAEs), offer a way to decode LLM activations into interpretable and, ideally, controllable concepts. On the one hand, these approaches alleviate the need for supervision from concept labels, paired prompts, or explicit causal models. On the other hand, without additional assumptions, SAEs are not guaranteed to be identifiable. In practice, they may learn latent dimensions that entangle multiple underlying concepts. If we use these dimensions to extract vectors for steering specific LLM behaviours, this non-identifiability might result in interventions that inadvertently affect unrelated properties. In this paper, we bring the question of identifiability to the forefront of LLM interpretability research. Specifically, we introduce Sparse Shift Autoencoders (SSAEs) which learn sparse representations of differences between embeddings rather than the embeddings themselves. Crucially, we show that SSAEs are identifiable from paired observations which differ in multiple unknown concepts, but not all. With this key identifiability result, we show that we can steer single concepts with only this weak form of supervision. Finally, we empirically demonstrate identifiable concept recovery across multiple real-world language datasets by disentangling activations from different LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
  2. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
  3. 2025Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability
  4. 2026Concept Component Analysis: A Principled Approach for Concept Extraction in LLMs
  5. 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations
  6. 2025Unveiling Decision-Making in LLMs for Text Classification : Extraction of influential and interpretable concepts with Sparse Autoencoders
  7. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Can Capture Language-Specific Concepts Across Diverse Languages
  8. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models