mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Optimal Transport for Sparse Autoencoder Feature Matching and Circuit Compression

arXiv 2605.28567 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have become a central tool for interpreting language models. However, two key SAE analyses that remain difficult to scale are (1) matching semantically similar features across multi-layers and (2) compressing large feature circuits into interpretable supernodes. Although these have been treated as separate problems, we show that both are instances of a more fundamental challenge, which we frame as the estimation of semantic distances between SAE features that lie on different activation manifolds. We introduce a distributional framework for this problem, in which each feature is represented not by a single decoder vector like in the literature, but by an activation-weighted distribution over the hidden states that express it. By projecting these distributions into a shared reference space and comparing them with Wasserstein distance, our method provides a unified semantic metric for cross-layer feature comparison. We prove that our representation is invariant to activation rescaling, stable under perturbations, and recovers true matches under finite-sample margin conditions. Empirically, our method outperforms decoder-vector and LLM-based baselines and captures subtle functional distinctions between related features. Notably, our method compresses large feature circuits into interpretable supernodes automatically.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec
  2. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
  3. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  2. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  3. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  4. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  5. 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 209
  6. 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 115
  7. 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 45
  8. 2025Overcoming Sparsity Artifacts in Crosscoders to Interpret Chat-Tuningcited by 34
  9. 2024Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layerscited by 22
  10. 2025Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Modelscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?
  2. 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
  3. 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometry
  4. 2025Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation
  5. 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
  6. 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
  7. 2024Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders
  8. 2026Discovering Millions of Interpretable Features with Sparse Autoencoders