Robust Layerwise Scaling Rules by Proper Weight Decay Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Empirical scaling laws prescribe how to allocate parameters, data, and compute, while maximal-update parameterization (μP) enables learning-rate transfer across widths by equalizing early-time update magnitudes. However, in modern scale-invariant architectures, training quickly enters an optimizer-governed steady state where normalization layers create backward scale sensitivity and the effective learning rate becomes width dependent, degrading μP transfer. We address this by introducing a weight-decay scaling rule for AdamW that preserves sublayer gain across widths. Empirically, the singular-value spectrum of each matrix parameter scales in norm as √η/λ with an approximately invariant shape; under width scaling d, we observe that the top singular value scales approximately as √η/λ· d0.75. Combining this observation with the μP learning-rate rule η2propto d-1 for matrix-like parameters implies an empirical weight-decay scaling rule λ2propto √d that approximately keeps sublayer gains width invariant. Together with vector-like parameters trained at η1=Thetad(1) and λ1=0, this yields zero-shot transfer of both learning rate and weight decay from proxy to target widths, removing per-width sweeps. We validate the rule on LLaMA-style Transformers and in a minimal synthetic setting, and we provide a simple diagnostic, matching top singular values, to check sublayer-gain invariance. Our results extend μP beyond the near-init regime by explicitly controlling steady-state scales set by the optimizer, offering a practical recipe for width-robust hyperparameter transfer under AdamW.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.
Builds on
49 of 64 references.
References · 49
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
37 more
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 466
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 426
- 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 357
- 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 300
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 288
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 221
- 2019Understanding and Improving Layer Normalizationcited by 217
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
- 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 190
- 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 128
- 2019An Exponential Learning Rate Schedule for Deep Learningcited by 121
- 2023A Spectral Condition for Feature Learningcited by 109
- 2018Trainability and Accuracy of Neural Networks: An Interacting Particle System Approachcited by 106
- 2022Self-Consistent Dynamical Field Theory of Kernel Evolution in Wide Neural Networkscited by 105
- 2025Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Themcited by 100
- 2023Tensor Programs VI: Feature Learning in Infinite-Depth Neural Networkscited by 97
- 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 78
- 2023Why Do We Need Weight Decay in Modern Deep Learning?cited by 72
- 2023Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2024How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset sizecited by 43
- 2024Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizonscited by 40
- 2023Tensor Programs IVb: Adaptive Optimization in the Infinite-Width Limitcited by 38
- 2024u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrizationcited by 29
- 2024Weight decay induces low-rank attention layerscited by 27
- 2020On the Overlooked Pitfalls of Weight Decay and How to Mitigate Them: A Gradient-Norm Perspectivecited by 25
- 2024Rethinking Conventional Wisdom in Machine Learning: From Generalization to Scalingcited by 23
- 2025Why Gradients Rapidly Increase Near the End of Trainingcited by 22
- 2022Infinite-width limit of deep linear neural networkscited by 20
- 2025Deep Linear Network Training Dynamics from Random Initialization: Data, Width, Depth, and Hyperparameter Transfercited by 19
- 2021Hyperparameter Transfer Learning with Adaptive Complexitycited by 17
- 2025Generalized Gradient Norm Clipping & Non-Euclidean (L0,L1)-Smoothnesscited by 17
- 2024Sparse maximal update parameterization: A holistic approach to sparse training dynamicscited by 16
- 2025Mirror, Mirror of the Flow: How Does Regularization Shape Implicit Bias?cited by 12
- 2024μP2: Effective Sharpness Aware Minimization Requires Layerwise Perturbation Scalingcited by 10
- 2025Optimal Scaling Needs Optimal Normcited by 8
- 2025Global Convergence and Rich Feature Learning in L-Layer Infinite-Width Neural Networks under μP Parametrizationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Them II: Hyperball Optimizationcited by 16
- 2026How to Set the Learning Rate for Large-Scale Pre-training?cited by 5
- 2026A Two-Parameter Weibull Framework for Diagnosing Transformer Weight Distributionscited by 3
- 2026Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatzcited by 2
- 2026Weibull Weight-Scale Parameter Evolution under AdamW Training Dynamicscited by 2
- 2026On the Nonlinearity of Learning Rate Scaling for LLM Trainingcited by 2
- 2026Data Predictability Shapes Weibull Weight-Scale Growth in Transformer Trainingcited by 1
- 2026Towards a Principled Muon under μmathsfP: Ensuring Spectral Conditions throughout Trainingcited by 0
- 2026On the Nonlinearity of Learning Rate Scaling for LLM Training28 Jun 2026
- 2026Data Predictability Shapes Weibull Weight-Scale Growth in Transformer Training27 Jun 2026
- 2026Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Them II: Hyperball Optimization15 Jun 2026
- 2026Weibull Weight-Scale Parameter Evolution under AdamW Training Dynamics11 Jun 2026
- 2026A Two-Parameter Weibull Framework for Diagnosing Transformer Weight Distributions17 May 2026
- 2026Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law with Neural Ansatz10 Feb 2026
- 2026How to Set the Learning Rate for Large-Scale Pre-training?8 Jan 2026
- 2026Towards a Principled Muon under μmathsfP: Ensuring Spectral Conditions throughout Training4 Jan 2026