mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Zero-Label Driving Scenario Complexity Detection via Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture

arXiv 2606.28383 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → VLMs for autonomous driving

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying complex and safety-critical driving scenarios in large unlabelled datasets is an important but expensive problem. Existing approaches rely on human annotators, supervised classifiers, or carefully engineered rule sets, all of which require substantial prior knowledge about what constitutes a difficult scenario. We ask whether a model can discover scenario complexity on its own, with no labels at any stage. We train a minimal Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) on structured agent state data from the nuPlan mini dataset and use the temporal prediction error as a zero-shot complexity score. Without access to any ground-truth labels during training or evaluation setup, the model assigns significantly higher scores to scenarios involving unprotected turns, crosswalk interactions, and pedestrian proximity, and significantly lower scores to lane-following and stationary-traffic scenarios. We validate this finding through four ablation experiments that isolate the source of the signal, and through a downstream anomaly detection evaluation that achieves Average Precision of 0.512 against a 0.436 chance baseline. The results show that temporal prediction error in a self-supervised latent world model is a practical proxy for driving scenario complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLMs for autonomous driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

5 of 6 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  2. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  3. 2021NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehiclescited by 493
  4. 2026Drive-JEPA: Video JEPA Meets Multimodal Trajectory Distillation for End-to-End Drivingcited by 30
  5. 2025Surprise Potential as a Measure of Interactivity in Driving Scenarioscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning from Risk: LLM-Guided Generation of Safety-Critical Scenarios with Prior Knowledge
  2. 2026Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction via Transformer-Based Models
  3. 2026A knowledge-augmented dataset of high-risk driving scenarios with LLM annotations for autonomous driving
  4. 2026Aligning Microscopic Vehicle and Macroscopic Traffic Statistics: Reconstructing Driving Behavior from Partial Data
  5. 2024Towards Explainable, Safe Autonomous Driving with Language Embeddings for Novelty Identification and Active Learning: Framework and Experimental Analysis with Real-World Data Sets
  6. 2026Safety-Critical Scenarios Emerge from Initial Scenes ↗
  7. 2025RefAV: Towards Planning-Centric Scenario Mining
  8. 2021Towards Learning Generalizable Driving Policies from Restricted Latent Representations