Aligning Microscopic Vehicle and Macroscopic Traffic Statistics: Reconstructing Driving Behavior from Partial Data
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Imitation-learning end-to-end planners
Abstract (arXiv)
A driving algorithm that aligns with good human driving practices, or at the very least collaborates effectively with human drivers, is crucial for developing safe and efficient autonomous vehicles. In practice, two main approaches are commonly adopted: (i) supervised or imitation learning, which requires comprehensive naturalistic driving data capturing all states that influence a vehicle's decisions and corresponding actions, and (ii) reinforcement learning (RL), where the simulated driving environment either matches or is intentionally more challenging than real-world conditions. Both methods depend on high-quality observations of real-world driving behavior, which are often difficult and costly to obtain. State-of-the-art sensors on individual vehicles can gather microscopic data, but they lack context about the surrounding conditions. Conversely, roadside sensors can capture traffic flow and other macroscopic characteristics, but they cannot associate this information with individual vehicles on a microscopic level. Motivated by this complementarity, we propose a framework that reconstructs unobserved microscopic states from macroscopic observations, using microscopic data to anchor observed vehicle behaviors, and learns a shared policy whose behavior is microscopically consistent with the partially observed trajectories and actions and macroscopically aligned with target traffic statistics when deployed population-wide. Such constrained and regularized policies promote realistic flow patterns and safe coordination with human drivers at scale.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,068
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
- 2017End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 479
- 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
- 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 313
- 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 266
- 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 251
- 2015DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Drivingcited by 229
- 2016End-to-end Learning of Driving Models from Large-scale Video Datasetscited by 147
- 2019Urban Driving with Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 84
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Learning to Drive by Imitating Surrounding Vehicles
- 2021Calibration of Human Driving Behavior and Preference Using Naturalistic Traffic Data
- 2023Long-term Microscopic Traffic Simulation with History-Masked Multi-agent Imitation Learning
- 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradients
- 2022Model-Based Imitation Learning for Urban Driving
- 2025RoaD: Rollouts as Demonstrations for Closed-Loop Supervised Fine-Tuning of Autonomous Driving Policies
- 2022Imitation Is Not Enough: Robustifying Imitation with Reinforcement Learning for Challenging Driving Scenarios
- 2023Car-Following Models: A Multidisciplinary Review