The Impact of VAE Design on Latent Pose Representations for Diffusion-based Sign Language Production
On the map: Diffusion models → Sign language production
Abstract (arXiv)
Latent diffusion approaches to sign language production (SLP) rely on an initial stage that learns an encoding of sign pose sequences, enabling generative modeling in the resulting latent space. The autoencoder used in this stage is typically evaluated in terms of reconstruction quality using geometric metrics common in SLP. While informative, these metrics do not fully capture latent space properties that may influence the training and performance of the downstream generative model. In this work, we investigate how architectural and training objective design choices in a variational autoencoder (VAE) for sign pose encoding affect latent space structure, and how these differences translate into the performance of a latent diffusion model for text-to-sign generation. Our experiments on Phoenix14T dataset show that variations in generative performance, measured through back-translation BLEU scores, can sometimes be better explained by differences in latent space properties than by VAE reconstruction accuracy alone.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Sign language production, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Text2Sign Diffusion: A Generative Approach for Gloss-Free Sign Language Production13 Sep
- 2025Text-Driven Diffusion Model for Sign Language Production20 Mar
- 2023Neural Sign Actors: A diffusion model for 3D sign language production from text5 Dec
- 2022G2P-DDM: Generating Sign Pose Sequence from Gloss Sequence with Discrete Diffusion Model19 Aug
Other references · 16
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2022MagicVideo: Efficient Video Generation With Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 463
- 2025Reconstruction vs. Generation: Taming Optimization Dilemma in Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 376
- 2017HP-GAN: Probabilistic 3D human motion prediction via GANcited by 176
- 2019Don't Blame the ELBO! A Linear VAE Perspective on Posterior Collapsecited by 120
- 2020Progressive Transformers for End-to-End Sign Language Productioncited by 119
- 2020Multi-channel Transformers for Multi-articulatory Sign Language Translationcited by 71
- 2024T2S-GPT: Dynamic Vector Quantization for Autoregressive Sign Language Production from Textcited by 30
- 2025Towards Scalable Pre-training of Visual Tokenizers for Generationcited by 26
- 2024A Data-Driven Representation for Sign Language Productioncited by 17
4 more
- 2024Sign-IDD: Iconicity Disentangled Diffusion for Sign Language Productioncited by 16
- 2023Sign Language Production with Latent Motion Transformercited by 13
- 2025Disentangle and Regularize: Sign Language Production with Articulator-Based Disentanglement and Channel-Aware Regularizationcited by 5
- 2025SLRTP2025 Sign Language Production Challenge: Methodology, Results, and Future Workcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Hybrid Autoregressive-Diffusion Model for Real-Time Sign Language Production
- 2025Diverse Signer Avatars with Manual and Non-Manual Feature Modelling for Sign Language Production
- 2026SignRefine: Adapting Foundational Video Models for Sign Language Generation
- 2023SignDiff: Diffusion Model for American Sign Language Production
- 2025Geometry-Preserving Encoder/Decoder in Latent Generative Models
- 2025Exploring Representation-Aligned Latent Space for Better Generation
- 2026MaDiS: Taming Masked Diffusion Language Models for Sign Language Generation
- 2026SignNet-1M: Large-Scale Multilingual Sign Language Video Dataset with Downstream Benchmarks