Geometry-Preserving Encoder/Decoder in Latent Generative Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative modeling aims to generate new data samples that resemble a given dataset. When using diffusion models for this task, one of the main challenges is solving the problem in the input space, which tends to be very high-dimensional. To address this, recent approaches solve diffusion models in the latent space through an encoder that maps from the data space to a lower-dimensional latent space, improving training efficiency and achieving state-of-the-art results. The variational autoencoder (VAE) is the most commonly used encoder/decoder framework in this domain, known for its ability to learn latent representations and generate data samples. In this paper, we introduce a novel encoder/decoder framework with theoretical properties distinct from those of the VAE, specifically designed to preserve the geometric structure of the data distribution. We demonstrate the significant advantages of this geometry-preserving encoder in the training process of both the encoder and decoder. Additionally, we provide theoretical results proving convergence of the training process, including convergence guarantees for encoder training, and results showing faster convergence of decoder training when using the geometry-preserving encoder.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 29 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2025.
Builds on
29 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024PaGoDA: Progressive Growing of a One-Step Generator from a Low-Resolution Diffusion Teacher23 May
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models20 Dec
- 2021Vector Quantized Diffusion Model for Text-to-Image Synthesis29 Nov
- 2021Score-based Generative Modeling in Latent Space10 Jun
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov
Other references · 24
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
- 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
- 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 314
- 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
- 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 206
- 2017VEEGAN: Reducing Mode Collapse in GANs using Implicit Variational Learningcited by 200
12 more
- 2023Flow Matching in Latent Spacecited by 160
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating Exploding Inverses in Invertible Neural Networkscited by 71
- 2019Sliced Gromov-Wassersteincited by 66
- 2019Learning Generative Models across Incomparable Spacescited by 53
- 2020Variational Autoencoder with Learned Latent Structurecited by 41
- 2022Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysiscited by 28
- 2020Isometric Autoencoderscited by 18
- 2021DyDiff-VAE: A Dynamic Variational Framework for Information Diffusion Predictioncited by 18
- 2024On Probabilistic Embeddings in Optimal Dimension Reductioncited by 5
- 2022Convergent autoencoder approximation of low bending and low distortion manifold embeddingscited by 4
- 2023Monotone Generative Modeling via a Gromov-Monge Embeddingcited by 3
- 2024Improving Hyperbolic Representations via Gromov-Wasserstein Regularizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2026Riemannian Archetypal Analysis: Interpretable non-linear data analysis on deformed star distributionscited by 1
- 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometrycited by 0
- 2025Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Data Publication: A Bilevel Optimization Framework with Curvature-Guided Perturbationcited by 0
- 2025Complex variational autoencoders admit K"ahler structurecited by 0
- 2026Understanding Latent Diffusability via Fisher Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Continuous-Time Trajectory Generation from Discrete Observations with Stochasticitycited by 0
- 2026Continuous-Time Trajectory Generation from Discrete Observations with Stochasticity25 Sep 2026
- 2026Riemannian Archetypal Analysis: Interpretable non-linear data analysis on deformed star distributions22 May 2026
- 2026Understanding Latent Diffusability via Fisher Geometry3 Apr 2026
- 2025Complex variational autoencoders admit K"ahler structure19 Nov 2025
- 2025Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Data Publication: A Bilevel Optimization Framework with Curvature-Guided Perturbation2 Sep 2025
- 2025Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometry28 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Variational Diffusion Auto-encoder: Latent Space Extraction from Pre-trained Diffusion Models
- 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoders
- 2025CoVAE: Consistency Training of Variational Autoencoders
- 2025Representing 3D Shapes With 64 Latent Vectors for 3D Diffusion Models
- 2022Diffusion bridges vector quantized Variational AutoEncoders
- 2022DiffuseVAE: Efficient, Controllable and High-Fidelity Generation from Low-Dimensional Latents
- 2026Geometric Autoencoder for Diffusion Models
- 2025Generalization in VAE and Diffusion Models: A Unified Information-Theoretic Analysis