mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Your Mouse and Eyes Secretly Leak Your Preference: LLM Alignment using Implicit Feedback from Users

arXiv 2606.20482 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

To align a Large Language Model (LLM), most existing methods collect explicit human feedback and train a reward model to predict the human preference based on the response text. These existing methods have two key limitations. First, the users rarely provide explicit feedback for LLM responses, which makes the high-quality preference annotation expensive to collect. Second, the methods do not leverage implicit human feedback, which has proven vital to the economic moats of Internet giants. To quantify the value of implicit feedback, we build a new dataset called IFLLM, which collects 1336 multi-turn questions from the 59 Mechanical Turk workers, their mouse trajectories, and eye gazing points to the LLMs' responses from their webcams. IFLLM shows that the users have very diverse types of gazing behavior and mouse trajectories. Our reward model based on the implicit user feedback boosts the accuracy of the text-based reward model from 55% to 64% and nearly triples the relative response quality improvements after applying the DPO to eight LLMs, demonstrating the value of implicit feedback in the wild. Our data collection website, dataset, and codes can be found at https://github.com/themehulpatwari/llm-implicit-feedback/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DRIFT: Learning from Abundant User Dissatisfaction in Real-World Preference Learning27 Sep
  2. 2025OASST-ETC Dataset: Alignment Signals from Eye-tracking Analysis of LLM Responses13 Mar
  3. 2024WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback28 Aug
  4. 2024Aligning LLM Agents by Learning Latent Preference from User Edits23 Apr

Other references · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  4. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  5. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
  6. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 291
  7. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 135
  8. 2023Voila-A: Aligning Vision-Language Models with User's Gaze Attentioncited by 28
  9. 2024Seeing Eye to AI: Human Alignment via Gaze-Based Response Rewards for Large Language Modelscited by 12
  10. 2021A Survey on Using Gaze Behaviour for Natural Language Processingcited by 11
  11. 2024EyeTrans: Merging Human and Machine Attention for Neural Code Summarizationcited by 9
  12. 2025All Claims Are Equal, but Some Claims Are More Equal Than Others: Importance-Sensitive Factuality Evaluation of LLM Generationscited by 6
5 more
  1. 2025RLHF Fine-Tuning of LLMs for Alignment with Implicit User Feedback in Conversational Recommenderscited by 5
  2. 2025EyeMulator: Improving Code Language Models by Mimicking Human Visual Attentioncited by 4
  3. 2026Controlling Reading Ease with Gaze-Guided Text Generationcited by 3
  4. 2026ImplicitRM: Unbiased Reward Modeling from Implicit Preference Data for LLM alignmentcited by 3
  5. 2026Gaze patterns predict preference and confidence in pairwise AI image evaluationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  2. 2024Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences
  3. 2025MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignment
  4. 2024Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction
  5. 2025CUPID: Evaluating Personalized and Contextualized Alignment of LLMs from Interactions
  6. 2024Aligning to Thousands of Preferences via System Message Generalization
  7. 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
  8. 2024Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes