mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ImplicitRM: Unbiased Reward Modeling from Implicit Preference Data for LLM alignment

arXiv 2603.23184 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AI stat.APcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the success of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), existing reward modeling methods largely rely on explicit feedback, which is costly to collect and difficult to scale. This work studies implicit reward modeling, learning reward models from implicit user feedback, such as clicks, copies and skips. While scalable and cost-effective, implicit feedback poses two key challenges: It lacks definitive negative samples, which makes standard positive-negative classification methods inapplicable; It suffers from selection bias, where responses have heterogeneous propensities to elicit feedback, which further obscures definitive negative samples. To address these challenges, we propose ImplicitRM, which learns unbiased reward models from implicit feedback. It stratifies training samples into four latent groups using a stratification model and derives a likelihood-maximization objective that is theoretically unbiased, thereby addressing both challenges. Experiments across diverse LLM backbones and benchmark datasets validate that ImplicitRM learns accurate reward models from implicit feedback and improves performance on downstream RLHF tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.

Builds on

29 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026CausalRM: Causal-Theoretic Reward Modeling for RLHF from Observational User Feedbacks19 Mar
  2. 2024InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling14 Feb

Other references · 27

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  7. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  8. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  9. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  10. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
  11. 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 460
  12. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
15 more
  1. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  2. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 320
  3. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
  4. 2017Advances in Variational Inferencecited by 236
  5. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  6. 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 140
  7. 2019Large-scale Causal Approaches to Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimation with Multi-task Learningcited by 39
  8. 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 37
  9. 2022StableDR: Stabilized Doubly Robust Learning for Recommendation on Data Missing Not at Randomcited by 24
  10. 2025User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signalcited by 19
  11. 2022Entire Space Counterfactual Learning for Reliable Content Recommendationscited by 13
  12. 2022Instance-dependent Label Distribution Estimation for Learning with Label Noisecited by 9
  13. 2024Debiased Recommendation with Noisy Feedbackcited by 8
  14. 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixingcited by 5
  15. 2026TourPlanner: A Competitive Consensus Framework with Constraint-Gated Reinforcement Learning for Travel Planningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024On the Limited Generalization Capability of the Implicit Reward Model Induced by Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier
  3. 2024Post-hoc Reward Calibration: A Case Study on Length Bias
  4. 2025Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment
  5. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  6. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  7. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
  8. 2024Towards Understanding the Influence of Reward Margin on Preference Model Performance