mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes

arXiv 2412.13998 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly embedded in everyday applications, ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge. Currently deployed approaches typically assume homogeneous user objectives and rely on single-objective fine-tuning. However, human preferences are inherently heterogeneous, influenced by various unobservable factors, leading to conflicting signals in preference data. Existing solutions addressing this diversity often require costly datasets labelled for specific objectives and involve training multiple reward models or LLM policies, which is computationally expensive and impractical. In this work, we present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment, where users' underlying preferences are inferred from a small sample of their choices. To achieve this, we extend the Bradley-Terry-Luce model to handle heterogeneous preferences with unobserved variability factors and propose its practical implementation for reward modelling and LLM fine-tuning. Thanks to our proposed approach of functional parameter-space conditioning, LLMs trained with our framework can be adapted to individual preferences at inference time, generating outputs over a continuum of behavioural modes. We empirically validate the effectiveness of methods, demonstrating their ability to capture and align with diverse human preferences in a data-efficient manner. Our code is made available at: https://github.com/kasia-kobalczyk/few-shot-steerable-alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences23 May
  2. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment29 Feb
  3. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards28 Feb
  4. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs3 Feb
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  4. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  6. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  7. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  8. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
  9. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
  10. 2024A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 184
  11. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 155
  12. 2024Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuningcited by 43
1 more
  1. 2024Pareto-Optimal Learning from Preferences with Hidden Contextcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment
  2. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  3. 2025Aligning LLMs with Domain Invariant Reward Models
  4. 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment
  5. 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
  6. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  7. 2025Self-Consistency of the Internal Reward Models Improves Self-Rewarding Language Models
  8. 2024Transforming and Combining Rewards for Aligning Large Language Models