TrustedARI: Towards Trust-Native Agentic Routing Infrastructure for Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents increasingly access external models, tools, and services through Agentic Routing Infrastructure (ARI) to manage the overhead of heterogeneous interfaces and fragmented subscriptions. Yet, the architecture of ARI introduces fundamental trust risks: it obtains plaintext access to agent queries and service responses, while leaving agents unable to verify that their queries are routed to intended service providers or that requests and responses remain untampered. To address this problem, we present TrustedARI, the first trust-native agentic routing infrastructure for agentic AI. Architecturally, TrustedARI is built upon three core innovations: (i) an ARI-adapted three-party TLS handshake that enables the agent and ARI to jointly authenticate the service provider through role-specific distribution of TLS key materials; (ii) a privacy-preserving query-construction protocol that allows the agent and ARI to collaboratively construct well-formed queries without exposing their respective private inputs; and (iii) a verifiable billing protocol that supports fair usage-based settlement while preserving the integrity and confidentiality of service responses. We implemented and extensively evaluated a prototype of TrustedARI to validate its performance. Experiments confirm that TrustedARI is highly efficient: our ARI-adapted handshake protocol reduces communication overhead by 39.34% compared to the existing three-party TLS handshake. Furthermore, the privacy-preserving query-construction protocol imposes negligible overhead-averaging 0.19 seconds in computation time and 0.58 MB in communication costs-while the verifiable billing protocol speeds up proof generation by 28.20x. Crucially, TrustedARI is readily deployable without any modification to the service providers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
15 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025MCPZoo: A Large-Scale Dataset of Runnable Model Context Protocol Servers for AI Agent17 Dec
- 2025IntentMiner: Intent Inversion Attack via Tool Call Analysis in the Model Context Protocol16 Dec
- 2025MCPTox: A Benchmark for Tool Poisoning Attack on Real-World MCP Servers19 Aug
- 2025MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI System17 Apr
- 2025MCP Safety Audit: LLMs with the Model Context Protocol Allow Major Security Exploits2 Apr
Other references · 10
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
- 2025LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools?cited by 48
- 2025MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocolcited by 34
- 2025ETDI: Mitigating Tool Squatting and Rug Pull Attacks in Model Context Protocol (MCP) by using OAuth-Enhanced Tool Definitions and Policy-Based Access Controlcited by 20
- 2025Securing GenAI Multi-Agent Systems Against Tool Squatting: A Zero Trust Registry-Based Approachcited by 18
- 2026Overcoming the Retrieval Barrier: Indirect Prompt Injection in the Wild for LLM Systemscited by 16
- 2025We Urgently Need Privilege Management in MCP: A Measurement of API Usage in MCP Ecosystemscited by 15
- 2019DECO: Liberating Web Data Using Decentralized Oracles for TLScited by 7
- 2026Anonymization-Enhanced Privacy Protection for Mobile GUI Agents: Available but Invisiblecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
- 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
- 2025The Trust Fabric: Decentralized Interoperability and Economic Coordination for the Agentic Web
- 2025Trustworthy AI in the Agentic Lakehouse: from Concurrency to Governance
- 2025Fortifying the Agentic Web: A Unified Zero-Trust Architecture Against Logic-layer Threats
- 2025SAFEFLOW: A Principled Protocol for Trustworthy and Transactional Autonomous Agent Systems
- 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges