NeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but their lack of interpretable reasoning and tendency to hallucinate pose significant challenges for legal applications. While LLMs show promise for legal text analysis and generation, they struggle with accurate citation attribution and precedent verification. For example, in legal contexts, a single incorrect precedent can jeopardize a case. Current approaches to improve LLM reliability in legal domains suffer from two key limitations: inadequate integration of structured legal knowledge during training or fine-tuning, and insufficient verification mechanisms for generated legal content. To address these challenges, we propose the TRISM (Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Models) framework, which integrates NeuroSymbolic AI principles with LLMs to leverage both neural learning capabilities and symbolic reasoning over structured legal knowledge. The TRISM approach addresses the above limitations while maintaining interpretable decision pathways. Our framework formalizes the extraction of symbolic knowledge from legal textual documents and incorporates Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as a core component for grounding LLM outputs in verified legal sources. In this position paper, we make the following contributions: (1) An analysis of the limitations of AI in law; (2) Introduce RASOR RAG which creates foundations for neurosymbolic RAG by generating explicit interpretable rationales that could be formalized into symbolic representations; (3) A formalized methodology for creating symbolic legal knowledge bases that support both interpretable reasoning and output verification in LLMs; and (4) The TRISM framework for integrating symbolic legal knowledge with LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
31 of 78 references.
References · 31
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 376
- 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 236
- 2015Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphscited by 181
- 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 176
- 2024Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 150
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
19 more
- 2017Analogical Inference for Multi-Relational Embeddingscited by 69
- 2023SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 62
- 2024SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domaincited by 39
- 2023Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 38
- 2023Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 35
- 2023Using Large Language Models to Support Thematic Analysis in Empirical Legal Studiescited by 25
- 2024Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulationcited by 15
- 2023CaseEncoder: A Knowledge-enhanced Pre-trained Model for Legal Case Encodingcited by 14
- 2023Building Trustworthy NeuroSymbolic AI Systems: Consistency, Reliability, Explainability, and Safetycited by 14
- 2021Context-Aware Legal Citation Recommendation using Deep Learningcited by 12
- 2020Structural Text Segmentation of Legal Documentscited by 11
- 2024CaseLink: Inductive Graph Learning for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 11
- 2021Similar Cases Recommendation using Legal Knowledge Graphscited by 9
- 2023Prototype-Based Interpretability for Legal Citation Predictioncited by 9
- 2024Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Surveycited by 6
- 2025Ranking Free RAG: Replacing Re-ranking with Selection in RAG for Sensitive Domainscited by 5
- 2024TM-TREK at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Towards LLM-Based Automatic Boundary Detection for Human-Machine Mixed Textcited by 3
- 2020Clustering-based Automatic Construction of Legal Entity Knowledge Base from Contractscited by 2
- 2024A Prompt Engineering Approach and a Knowledge Graph based Framework for Tackling Legal Implications of Large Language Model Answerscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law
- 2026Bridging Legal Interpretation and Formal Logic: Faithfulness, Assumption, and the Future of AI Legal Reasoning
- 2025Explainable Rule Application via Structured Prompting: A Neural-Symbolic Approach
- 2026Reasoners or Translators? Contamination-aware Evaluation and Neuro-Symbolic Robustness in Tax Law
- 2024Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models
- 2026LePREC: Reasoning as Classification over Structured Factors for Assessing Relevance of Legal Issues
- 2023Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal Capabilities Emergence
- 2025Challenges for Generative AI in Legal Reasoning