Structural Text Segmentation of Legal Documents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing complexity of legal cases has lead to an increasing interest in legal information retrieval systems that can effectively satisfy user-specific information needs. However, such downstream systems typically require documents to be properly formatted and segmented, which is often done with relatively simple pre-processing steps, disregarding topical coherence of segments. Systems generally rely on representations of individual sentences or paragraphs, which may lack crucial context, or document-level representations, which are too long for meaningful search results. To address this issue, we propose a segmentation system that can predict topical coherence of sequential text segments spanning several paragraphs, effectively segmenting a document and providing a more balanced representation for downstream applications. We build our model on top of popular transformer networks and formulate structural text segmentation as topical change detection, by performing a series of independent classifications that allow for efficient fine-tuning on task-specific data. We crawl a novel dataset consisting of roughly 74,000 online Terms-of-Service documents, including hierarchical topic annotations, which we use for training. Results show that our proposed system significantly outperforms baselines, and adapts well to structural peculiarities of legal documents. We release both data and trained models to the research community for future work.https://github.com/dennlinger/TopicalChange
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022EUR-Lex-Sum: A Multi- and Cross-lingual Dataset for Long-form Summarization in the Legal Domaincited by 39
- 2023Bringing order into the realm of Transformer-based language models for artificial intelligence and lawcited by 13
- 2023Topic Segmentation Model Focusing on Local Contextcited by 3
- 2025Beyond checkmate: exploring the creative chokepoints in AI textcited by 2
- 2025Predicting potentially abusive clauses in Chilean terms of services with natural language processingcited by 1
- 2025LegalViz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generationcited by 1
- 2025Large Language Models Are Effective Human Annotation Assistants, But Not Good Independent Annotatorscited by 1
- 2026NeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Modelscited by 1
- 2023Unsupervised Scientific Abstract Segmentation with Normalized Mutual Informationcited by 0
- 2023Legal NLP Meets MiCAR: Advancing the Analysis of Crypto White Paperscited by 0
- 2026SegNSP: Revisiting Next Sentence Prediction for Linear Text Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026NeuroSymbolic AI for Legal AI-TRISM: Trustworthy, Reliable, Interpretable, Safe Models5 Apr 2026
- 2026SegNSP: Revisiting Next Sentence Prediction for Linear Text Segmentation7 Jan 2026
- 2025Large Language Models Are Effective Human Annotation Assistants, But Not Good Independent Annotators9 Mar 2025
- 2025LegalViz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generation10 Feb 2025
- 2025Predicting potentially abusive clauses in Chilean terms of services with natural language processing2 Feb 2025
- 2025Beyond checkmate: exploring the creative chokepoints in AI text31 Jan 2025
- 2023Legal NLP Meets MiCAR: Advancing the Analysis of Crypto White Papers16 Oct 2023
- 2023Bringing order into the realm of Transformer-based language models for artificial intelligence and law10 Aug 2023
- 2023Unsupervised Scientific Abstract Segmentation with Normalized Mutual Information19 May 2023
- 2023Topic Segmentation Model Focusing on Local Context5 Jan 2023
- 2022EUR-Lex-Sum: A Multi- and Cross-lingual Dataset for Long-form Summarization in the Legal Domain24 Oct 2022