When Autonomy Breaks: The Hidden Existential Risk of AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI risks are typically framed around physical threats to humanity, a loss of control or an accidental error causing humanity's extinction. However, I argue in line with the gradual disempowerment thesis, that there is an underappreciated risk in the slow and irrevocable decline of human autonomy. As AI starts to outcompete humans in various areas of life, a tipping point will be reached where it no longer makes sense to rely on human decision-making, creativity, social care or even leadership. What may follow is a process of gradual de-skilling, where we lose skills that we currently take for granted. Traditionally, it is argued that AI will gain human skills over time, and that these skills are innate and immutable in humans. By contrast, I argue that humans may lose such skills as critical thinking, decision-making and even social care in an AGI world. The biggest threat to humanity is therefore not that machines will become more like humans, but that humans will become more like machines.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.
Builds on
4 of 53 references.
References · 4
- 2024Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performancecited by 58
- 2022Large Language Models and the Reverse Turing Testcited by 38
- 2024Objection Overruled! Lay People can Distinguish Large Language Models from Lawyers, but still Favour Advice from an LLMcited by 16
- 2025De-skilling, Cognitive Offloading, and Misplaced Responsibilities: Potential Ironies of AI-Assisted Designcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.