Controlled Dynamics Attractor Transformer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer architectures have dramatically advanced representation learning and inference in deep models through self-attention mechanisms. In parallel,associative memory (AM) frameworks map representations onto energy landscapes, offering interpretable retrieval mechanisms. However, their continuous-time inference dynamics lack the biological plausibility of classical Continuous Attractor Neural Networks (CANNs). To bridge this gap, we propose Controlled Dynamics Attractor Transformer (CDAT), which couples a mixture von Mises-Fisher (Mo-vMF) attention energy with a Hopfield refinement energy, while augmenting energy descent with a CANN-inspired excitation-inhibition modulation. CDAT instantiates a topology-constrained dynamical system whose couplings encode relational structure among tokens, thereby linking attractor-style dynamics to modern energy-based attention. We further provide a constructive dissipation analysis to formally establish their controlled inference dynamics. Benefiting from these robust and structured dynamics, CDAT achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks in graph anomaly detection and graph classification.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2026.
Builds on
31 of 57 references.
References · 31
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 457
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 250
- 2016Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognitioncited by 236
- 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 187
- 2019ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierarchical Graph Representationscited by 156
- 2020GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Trainingcited by 117
19 more
- 2020Large Associative Memory Problem in Neurobiology and Machine Learningcited by 112
- 2023Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mindcited by 107
- 2019Learning metrics for persistence-based summaries and applications for graph classificationcited by 57
- 2022Universal Hopfield Networks: A General Framework for Single-Shot Associative Memory Modelscited by 55
- 2023On Sparse Modern Hopfield Modelcited by 42
- 2019Universal Graph Transformer Self-Attention Networkscited by 41
- 2024Outlier-Efficient Hopfield Layers for Large Transformer-Based Modelscited by 38
- 2021Hierarchical Associative Memorycited by 34
- 2022Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Minimizationcited by 32
- 2021Attention Approximates Sparse Distributed Memorycited by 29
- 2020Bridging the Gap Between Spectral and Spatial Domains in Graph Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2021A New Perspective on the Effects of Spectrum in Graph Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2025Memory Decoder: A Pretrained, Plug-and-Play Memory for Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2023End-to-end Differentiable Clustering with Associative Memoriescited by 15
- 2024UniGAD: Unifying Multi-level Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 14
- 2021A remark on a paper of Krotov and Hopfield [arXiv:2008.06996]cited by 11
- 2022Content Addressable Memory Without Catastrophic Forgetting by Heteroassociation with a Fixed Scaffoldcited by 11
- 2024Graph Classification via Reference Distribution Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 11
- 2024Dense Associative Memory Through the Lens of Random Featurescited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.