mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How do Self-Supervised Remote Sensing Vision Models Transfer to Downstream Tasks?

arXiv 2606.13896 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised geospatial foundation models (GeoFMs) learn transferable representations from remote sensing data, but their downstream behavior is difficult to characterize. We study six representative GeoFMs spanning joint-embedding, reconstruction, and multimodal pretraining families, and evaluate transfer across classification, regression, and segmentation benchmarks under different label availability and downstream pipelines. We find that model rankings change across tasks and adaptation settings. Layerwise probing shows that, in most cases, task-relevant information is more accessible in intermediate transformer blocks compared to final-layer embeddings, and that GeoFMs exhibit distinct depthwise profiles. In segmentation case studies on PASTIS and Sen1Floods11, downstream adaptation settings such as decoder design and fine-tuning can be as impactful as the choice of GeoFM, and standard dense-prediction heads may be poorly aligned with how GeoFMs organize information over depth. Finally, CKA analysis on case studies shows that fine-tuning does not rewrite GeoFMs uniformly across depth, and the strongest changes are localized to the first linear layer of the MLP in ViT blocks. These results help explain why GeoFM rankings shift across benchmarks and motivate more representation-aware evaluation and adaptation strategies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

29 of 50 references.

References · 29

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  5. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,271
  6. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  7. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  8. 2022SatMAE: Pre-training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 408
  9. 2023RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensingcited by 363
  10. 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 308
  11. 2021Seasonal Contrast: Unsupervised Pre-Training from Uncurated Remote Sensing Datacited by 215
  12. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
17 more
  1. 2023CROMA: Remote Sensing Representations with Contrastive Radar-Optical Masked Autoencoderscited by 169
  2. 2021Panoptic Segmentation of Satellite Image Time Series with Convolutional Temporal Attention Networkscited by 143
  3. 2024Mission Critical -- Satellite Data is a Distinct Modality in Machine Learningcited by 77
  4. 2024Foundation Models for Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: A Surveycited by 70
  5. 2023Revisiting pre-trained remote sensing model benchmarks: resizing and normalization matterscited by 27
  6. 2025GEO-Bench-2: From Performance to Capability, Rethinking Evaluation in Geospatial AIcited by 21
  7. 2025A Survey on Remote Sensing Foundation Models: From Vision to Multimodalitycited by 19
  8. 2023Objectives Matter: Understanding the Impact of Self-Supervised Objectives on Vision Transformer Representationscited by 16
  9. 2023Partial Fine-Tuning: A Successor to Full Fine-Tuning for Vision Transformerscited by 7
  10. 2025NeuCo-Bench: A Novel Benchmark Framework for Neural Embeddings in Earth Observationcited by 7
  11. 2025A Genealogy of Foundation Models in Remote Sensingcited by 4
  12. 2026From Pixels to Patches: Pooling Strategies for Earth Embeddingscited by 4
  13. 2025Landsat-Bench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Landsat Foundation Modelscited by 3
  14. 2025Exploiting Layer Normalization Fine-tuning in Visual Transformer Foundation Models for Classificationcited by 3
  15. 2026Layer by layer, module by module: Choose both for optimal OOD probing of ViTcited by 2
  16. 2026How to Embed Matters: Evaluation of EO Embedding Design Choicescited by 1
  17. 2026From Edges to Depth: Probing the Spatial Hierarchy in Vision Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.