mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploiting Layer Normalization Fine-tuning in Visual Transformer Foundation Models for Classification

arXiv 2508.07577 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LayerNorm is pivotal in Vision Transformers (ViTs), yet its fine-tuning dynamics under data scarcity and domain shifts remain underexplored. This paper shows that shifts in LayerNorm parameters after fine-tuning (LayerNorm shifts) are indicative of the transitions between source and target domains; its efficacy is contingent upon the degree to which the target training samples accurately represent the target domain, as quantified by our proposed Fine-tuning Shift Ratio (FSR). Building on this, we propose a simple yet effective rescaling mechanism using a scalar λ that is negatively correlated to FSR to align learned LayerNorm shifts with those ideal shifts achieved under fully representative data, combined with a cyclic framework that further enhances the LayerNorm fine-tuning. Extensive experiments across natural and pathological images, in both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) settings, and various target training sample regimes validate our framework. Notably, OOD tasks tend to yield lower FSR and higher λ in comparison to ID cases, especially with scarce data, indicating under-represented target training samples. Moreover, ViTFs fine-tuned on pathological data behave more like ID settings, favoring conservative LayerNorm updates. Our findings illuminate the underexplored dynamics of LayerNorm in transfer learning and provide practical strategies for LayerNorm fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  6. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  10. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  11. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  12. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
13 more
  1. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
  2. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  3. 2019Understanding and Improving Layer Normalizationcited by 217
  4. 2016Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images: The GlaS Challenge Contestcited by 203
  5. 2024Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathologycited by 162
  6. 2022FacT: Factor-Tuning for Lightweight Adaptation on Vision Transformercited by 133
  7. 2018BACH: Grand Challenge on Breast Cancer Histology Imagescited by 131
  8. 2025Transformers without Normalizationcited by 70
  9. 2023Tuning LayerNorm in Attention: Towards Efficient Multi-Modal LLM Finetuningcited by 64
  10. 2022Parameter-Efficient Tuning on Layer Normalization for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 19
  11. 2023On the Effectiveness of LayerNorm Tuning for Continual Learning in Vision Transformerscited by 14
  12. 2023The Expressive Power of Tuning Only the Normalization Layerscited by 13
  13. 2024LayerNorm: A key component in parameter-efficient fine-tuningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.