mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CAPED: Context-Aware Privacy Exposure Defense for Mobile GUI Agents

arXiv 2606.12666 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Screenshot-based mobile GUI agents can operate ordinary smartphone apps through the same visual interface as a human user, but this capability also turns every screen observation into a privacy boundary. During normal task execution, screenshots may expose contacts, messages, photos, files, recommendations, health cues, and other sensitive context that is unrelated to the user's request. We call this problem incidental visual privacy exposure. It is difficult to address with existing defenses: text anonymization misses many visual and inferential cues, while generic privacy masking can remove the evidence and controls that a GUI agent needs to complete the task. This paper presents CAPED, a context-aware pre-upload exposure control layer for mobile GUI agents. CAPED is designed as a phone-side protection layer: before screenshots are released to a remote multimodal agent, it extracts task requirements, uses screen context as a privacy prior, parses visible UI elements, and selectively exposes only content needed for the current task while masking incidental private content. We evaluate CAPED on AndroidWorld for broad task utility and with a controlled 28-task seeded privacy evaluation used as a measurement instrument for trajectory-level incidental leakage. In this seeded evaluation, Full CAPED reduces success-conditioned weighted seeded leakage from 0.766 under raw screenshots to 0.268 while preserving high task utility. A broader AndroidWorld run shows a remaining prototype-level utility cost, but the results show that task-driven selective exposure can reduce incidental visual leakage before screenshots are released to a remote GUI agent.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

32 of 46 references.

References · 32

  1. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agentscited by 610
  2. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 567
  3. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 468
  4. 2023AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Userscited by 415
  5. 2024Mobile-Agent: Autonomous Multi-Modal Mobile Device Agent with Visual Perceptioncited by 293
  6. 2024OmniParser for Pure Vision Based GUI Agentcited by 198
  7. 2024On the Effects of Data Scale on UI Control Agentscited by 194
  8. 2025Mobile-Agent-v3: Fundamental Agents for GUI Automationcited by 190
  9. 2024Mobile-Agent-v2: Mobile Device Operation Assistant with Effective Navigation via Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 189
  10. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakagecited by 150
  11. 2025EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representationscited by 139
  12. 2025Mobile-Agent-E: Self-Evolving Mobile Assistant for Complex Taskscited by 131
20 more
  1. 2022PP-OCRv3: More Attempts for the Improvement of Ultra Lightweight OCR Systemcited by 106
  2. 2017Towards a Visual Privacy Advisor: Understanding and Predicting Privacy Risks in Imagescited by 101
  3. 2025Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memorycited by 101
  4. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agentscited by 82
  5. 2024Caution for the Environment: Multimodal LLM Agents are Susceptible to Environmental Distractionscited by 56
  6. 2024Private Attribute Inference from Images with Vision-Language Modelscited by 37
  7. 2025Simple Prompt Injection Attacks Can Leak Personal Data Observed by LLM Agents During Task Executioncited by 26
  8. 2017Connecting Pixels to Privacy and Utility: Automatic Redaction of Private Information in Imagescited by 24
  9. 2025MLA-Trust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal LLM Agents in GUI Environmentscited by 23
  10. 2025A3: Android Agent Arena for Mobile GUI Agents with Essential-State Procedural Evaluationcited by 19
  11. 2025AppVLM: A Lightweight Vision Language Model for Online App Controlcited by 15
  12. 2025Doxing via the Lens: Revealing Location-related Privacy Leakage on Multi-modal Large Reasoning Modelscited by 14
  13. 2023Visual Content Privacy Protection: A Surveycited by 11
  14. 2025Mind the Third Eye! Benchmarking Privacy Awareness in MLLM-powered Smartphone Agentscited by 8
  15. 2026Anonymization-Enhanced Privacy Protection for Mobile GUI Agents: Available but Invisiblecited by 6
  16. 2026CAPID: Context-Aware PII Detection for Question-Answering Systemscited by 3
  17. 2026WebPII: Benchmarking Visual PII Detection for Computer-Use Agentscited by 3
  18. 2026PRISM-XR: Empowering Privacy-Aware XR Collaboration with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1
  19. 2026PrivScope: Task-scoped Disclosure Control for Hybrid Agentic Systemscited by 1
  20. 2026MaskClaw: Edge-Side Personalized Privacy Arbitration for GUI Agents with Behavior-Driven Skill Evolutioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PriMobiBench: Characterizing Visual Privacy Leakage in VLM-Driven Mobile GUI Agents
  2. 2026GUIGuard-Bench: Toward a General Evaluation for Privacy-Preserving GUI Agents
  3. 2026MIRAGE: Context-Aware Prompt Injection against Mobile GUI Agents via User-Generated Content
  4. 2026"Allow" to Achieve, Over-Privileged Inadvertently: The Unintended Cost of Task-Completion-Driven Pop-up Decisions in Mobile GUI Agents
  5. 2026Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?
  6. 2026Mobile GUI Agent Privacy Personalization with Trajectory Induced Preference Optimization
  7. 2026PrivacyAssist: A User-Centric Agent Framework for Detecting Privacy Inconsistencies in Android Apps ↗
  8. 2026MobileWorldSafety: Benchmarking GUI Agent Safety Against Environmental Injection Attacks in Android Apps