mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MobileWorldSafety: Benchmarking GUI Agent Safety Against Environmental Injection Attacks in Android Apps

arXiv 2608.17659 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-powered GUI agents that autonomously operate smartphones are rapidly transitioning from research prototypes to early real-world deployment. However, because these agents routinely process untrusted environmental content, they are highly vulnerable to environmental injection attacks, which include indirect prompt injections and adversarial instructions. Such attacks can manipulate the behavior of agents without user awareness through diverse channels encountered in everyday mobile use. Despite these risks, existing benchmarks often fail to capture everyday user scenarios, lacking a systematic evaluation of GUI agents under environmental injection attacks on mobile devices. To address this gap, we introduce MobileWorldSafety, a benchmark of 142 risk tasks built on real Android applications. For each task, we define a programmatically verifiable risk indicator over the final system state and evaluate outcomes with a two-stage pipeline: rule-based verification handles unambiguous cases, while an LLM judge adjudicates ambiguous ones. This distinguishes safety failures from capability failures and enables objective and reproducible assessment. Evaluations on six agents, including both general agents and specialized GUI agents, demonstrate that all agents remain highly vulnerable, with attack success rates ranging from 40.4% to 66.9%. These findings indicate that current agents often fail to maintain safety alignment when adversarial content is presented as ordinary mobile context. MobileWorldSafety provides a foundation for quantifying these vulnerabilities and advancing research on robust mobile GUI agents.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 34 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

34 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 18

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents12 Apr
  2. 2026MalTool: Malicious Tool Attacks on LLM Agents12 Feb
  3. 2025OS-Sentinel: Towards Safety-Enhanced Mobile GUI Agents via Hybrid Validation in Realistic Workflows28 Oct
  4. 2025GhostEI-Bench: Do Mobile Agents Resilience to Environmental Injection in Dynamic On-Device Environments?23 Oct
  5. 2025ToolTweak: An Attack on Tool Selection in LLM-based Agents2 Oct
  6. 2025OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents17 Jun
  7. 2025VPI-Bench: Visual Prompt Injection Attacks for Computer-Use Agents3 Jun
  8. 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents28 Apr
  9. 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks22 Apr
  10. 2025The Obvious Invisible Threat: LLM-Powered GUI Agents' Vulnerability to Fine-Print Injections15 Apr
  11. 2025MIP against Agent: Malicious Image Patches Hijacking Multimodal OS Agents13 Mar
  12. 2025SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents6 Mar
6 more
  1. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents11 Oct
  2. 2024ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents9 Oct
  3. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  4. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage17 Sep
  5. 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar
  6. 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep

Other references · 16

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  3. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  4. 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 704
  5. 2024SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agentscited by 567
  6. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
  7. 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 468
  8. 2023AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Userscited by 415
  9. 2023Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Controlcited by 319
  10. 2024Mobile-Agent: Autonomous Multi-Modal Mobile Device Agent with Visual Perceptioncited by 293
  11. 2023AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Androidcited by 184
  12. 2025MAI-UI Technical Report: Real-World Centric Foundation GUI Agentscited by 91
4 more
  1. 2026Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agentscited by 79
  2. 2025MobileWorld: Benchmarking Autonomous Mobile Agents in Agent-User Interactive and MCP-Augmented Environmentscited by 72
  3. 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP) at First Glance: Studying the Security and Maintainability of MCP Serverscited by 65
  4. 2024MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Controlcited by 51

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?
  2. 2026AndroidDaily: A Verifiable Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents on Real-World Closed-Source Applications
  3. 2026AndroidReality: How Far Are Mobile Agents from the Real World?
  4. 2026(A)I Sees What You Don't: Exploiting New Attack Surfaces in Third-Party Mobile Agents
  5. 2025Evaluating the Robustness of Multimodal Agents Against Active Environmental Injection Attacks
  6. 2026SeerGuard: A Safety Framework for Mobile GUI Agents via World Model Prediction
  7. 2026Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial Environments
  8. 2025D-GARA: A Dynamic Benchmarking Framework for GUI Agent Robustness in Real-World Anomalies