GUIGuard-Bench: Toward a General Evaluation for Privacy-Preserving GUI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As GUI agents increasingly rely on screenshots to perceive and operate digital environments, they may inadvertently expose sensitive information such as identities, accounts, locations, and behavioral traces. While existing benchmarks primarily focus on task completion, grounding, or defenses against third-party attacks, current visual privacy datasets remain largely restricted to static natural images, limiting their ability to capture the contextual dependence and task relevance of privacy risks in GUI task trajectories. To bridge this gap, we introduce GUIGuard-Bench, a first-step benchmark for studying privacy-preserving GUI agents in trajectory-based GUI workflows. GUIGuard-Bench contains 241 real GUI-agent trajectories with 4,080 screenshots across Android and PC environments. Each screenshot is annotated at the region level with privacy bounding boxes, semantic privacy categories, risk levels, and whether the private information is necessary for completing the task. Built on these annotations, GUIGuard-Bench supports three complementary evaluations: privacy recognition, offline planning fidelity under protected screenshots, and the utility impact of different protection strategies. Our results show that current models can often detect whether a screenshot contains private information, but they struggle with fine-grained localization, category recognition, risk assessment, and task-necessity judgment. We also find that closed-source models, exemplified by Claude Sonnet 4.6, can maintain largely consistent planner semantics in Android environments after privacy protection is applied. Our results highlight privacy recognition as a critical bottleneck for practical GUI agents. Project: https://futuresis.github.io/GUIGuard-page/
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Anonymization-Enhanced Privacy Protection for Mobile GUI Agents: Available but Invisiblecited by 6
- 2026Safe, or Simply Incapable? Rethinking Safety Evaluation for Phone-Use Agentscited by 1
- 2026Software Engineering for and with GUI Agentcited by 1
- 2026RiskWebWorld: A Realistic Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents in E-commerce Risk Managementcited by 0
- 2026Software Engineering for and with GUI Agent10 Aug 2026
- 2026Safe, or Simply Incapable? Rethinking Safety Evaluation for Phone-Use Agents8 May 2026
- 2026RiskWebWorld: A Realistic Interactive Benchmark for GUI Agents in E-commerce Risk Management15 Apr 2026
- 2026Anonymization-Enhanced Privacy Protection for Mobile GUI Agents: Available but Invisible8 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PriMobiBench: Characterizing Visual Privacy Leakage in VLM-Driven Mobile GUI Agents
- 2026MaskClaw: Edge-Side Personalized Privacy Arbitration for GUI Agents with Behavior-Driven Skill Evolution
- 2026CAPED: Context-Aware Privacy Exposure Defense for Mobile GUI Agents
- 2026Mobile GUI Agent Privacy Personalization with Trajectory Induced Preference Optimization
- 2026WebPII: Benchmarking Visual PII Detection for Computer-Use Agents
- 2026ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions
- 2026"Allow" to Achieve, Over-Privileged Inadvertently: The Unintended Cost of Task-Completion-Driven Pop-up Decisions in Mobile GUI Agents
- 2026AgentCIScope: Grounded Contextual Integrity Evaluation for LLM Agents