mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mind the Third Eye! Benchmarking Privacy Awareness in MLLM-powered Smartphone Agents

arXiv 2508.19493 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.CR cs.CVcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Smartphones bring significant convenience to users but also enable devices to extensively record various types of personal information. Existing smartphone agents powered by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in automating different tasks. However, as the cost, these agents are granted substantial access to sensitive users' personal information during this operation. To gain a thorough understanding of the privacy awareness of these agents, we present the first large-scale benchmark encompassing 7,138 scenarios to the best of our knowledge. In addition, for privacy context in scenarios, we annotate its type (e.g., Account Credentials), sensitivity level, and location. We then carefully benchmark seven available mainstream smartphone agents. Our results demonstrate that almost all benchmarked agents show unsatisfying privacy awareness (RA), with performance remaining below 60% even with explicit hints. Overall, closed-source agents show better privacy ability than open-source ones, and Gemini 2.0-flash achieves the best, achieving an RA of 67%. We also find that the agents' privacy detection capability is highly related to scenario sensitivity level, i.e., the scenario with a higher sensitivity level is typically more identifiable. We hope the findings enlighten the research community to rethink the unbalanced utility-privacy tradeoff about smartphone agents. Our code and benchmark are available at https://zhixin-l.github.io/SAPA-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  2. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  3. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
  4. 2024Mobile-Agent: Autonomous Multi-Modal Mobile Device Agent with Visual Perceptioncited by 293
  5. 2024ShowUI: One Vision-Language-Action Model for GUI Visual Agentcited by 232
  6. 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluationcited by 81
  7. 2024CoCo-Agent: A Comprehensive Cognitive MLLM Agent for Smartphone GUI Automationcited by 70
  8. 2024AppAgent v2: Advanced Agent for Flexible Mobile Interactionscited by 68
  9. 2024MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agentscited by 63
  10. 2025A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agentscited by 62
  11. 2024MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Controlcited by 51
  12. 2025Advancing Mobile GUI Agents: A Verifier-Driven Approach to Practical Deploymentcited by 38
5 more
  1. 2024Exploring Response Uncertainty in MLLMs: An Empirical Evaluation under Misleading Scenarioscited by 19
  2. 2025SpiritSight Agent: Advanced GUI Agent with One Lookcited by 18
  3. 2024{A New Hope}: Contextual Privacy Policies for Mobile Applications and An Approach Toward Automated Generationcited by 4
  4. 2021A Taxonomy for Mining and Classifying Privacy Requirements in Issue Reportscited by 2
  5. 2024Privacy Impact Assessments in the Wild: A Scoping Reviewcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?
  2. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents
  3. 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
  4. 2025Measuring Physical-World Privacy Awareness of Large Language Models: An Evaluation Benchmark
  5. 2026iOSWorld: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Phone Agents
  6. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning
  7. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents
  8. 2025PrivacyBench: A Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Privacy in Personalized AI