mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reframing AI Loss of Control: What Control Is, How to Have It, How to Lose It

arXiv 2606.12442 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

At present, loss of control risks have gained much prominence in public discussion, particularly in relation to AI, with extensive discourse present among academics, frontier labs, and even governments. However, in the existing literature, the concept seems to rest on surprisingly weak foundations, where even those that discuss loss of control extensively do not first establish what control is and what exactly is being lost. Our paper aims to address these gaps. We establish a working definition of control by anchoring it to the "setting and getting of goals". Then, we discuss various aspects of control, built on foundational concepts from related fields like cybernetics, management control, and control theory. This includes who (or what) can be in control, and the things they require to be in control, such as the ability to set goals, having a functional control loop, having requisite variety, and having sufficient goal alignment. Once a framework for control is established, we then discuss how control can be lost, how AIs can contribute to such loss of control, and offer relevant recommendations for how one can maintain control. One interesting consequence of our work is that humanity, as individuals and as groups, can lose varying degrees of control as a result of AI behaviour that is far below the level of superintelligence; the potential for loss of control scenarios (as we define them) already exist, and have existed for a long time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 267 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

34 of 267 references.

References · 34

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  2. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
  3. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  4. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 379
  5. 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 287
  6. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
  7. 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 149
  8. 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 126
  9. 2025Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Taskcited by 106
  10. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 97
  11. 2025Demonstrating specification gaming in reasoning modelscited by 56
  12. 2025Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Developmentcited by 46
22 more
  1. 2025An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Securitycited by 45
  2. 2023Goodhart's Law in Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
  3. 2026Agents of Chaoscited by 32
  4. 2026AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performancecited by 9
  5. 2019Corrigibility with Utility Preservationcited by 8
  6. 2025Stop DDoS Attacking the Research Community with AI-Generated Survey Paperscited by 7
  7. 2020On Controllability of AIcited by 5
  8. 2025The Loss of Control Playbook: Degrees, Dynamics, and Preparednesscited by 5
  9. 2022Quantifying attention via dwell time and engagement in a social media browsing environmentcited by 4
  10. 2025Military AI Needs Technically-Informed Regulation to Safeguard AI Research and its Applicationscited by 4
  11. 2026Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2026cited by 4
  12. 2026"AI Psychosis" in Context: How Conversation History Shapes LLM Responses to Delusional Beliefscited by 3
  13. 2025The Problem of Algorithmic Collisions: Mitigating Unforeseen Risks in a Connected Worldcited by 2
  14. 2025The California Report on Frontier AI Policycited by 2
  15. 2025Autonomy by Design: Preserving Human Autonomy in AI Decision-Supportcited by 2
  16. 2025Human Resilience in the AI Era -- What Machines Can't Replacecited by 2
  17. 2026Defining AI Models and AI Systems: A Framework to Resolve the Boundary Problemcited by 2
  18. 2026The enrichment paradox: critical capability thresholds and irreversible dependency in human-AI symbiosiscited by 2
  19. 2024A.I. go by many names: towards a sociotechnical definition of artificial intelligencecited by 1
  20. 2025Dimensional Characterization and Pathway Modeling for Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 1
  21. 2026Motivation in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  22. 2026"We are currently clean on OPSEC": Why JD Can't Encryptcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.