mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Autonomy by Design: Preserving Human Autonomy in AI Decision-Support

arXiv 2506.23952 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI systems increasingly support human decision-making across domains of professional, skill-based, and personal activity. While previous work has examined how AI might affect human autonomy globally, the effects of AI on domain-specific autonomy -- the capacity for self-governed action within defined realms of skill or expertise -- remain understudied. We analyze how AI decision-support systems affect two key components of domain-specific autonomy: skilled competence (the ability to make informed judgments within one's domain) and authentic value-formation (the capacity to form genuine domain-relevant values and preferences). By engaging with prior investigations and analyzing empirical cases across medical, financial, and educational domains, we demonstrate how the absence of reliable failure indicators and the potential for unconscious value shifts can erode domain-specific autonomy both immediately and over time. We then develop a constructive framework for autonomy-preserving AI support systems. We propose specific socio-technical design patterns -- including careful role specification, implementation of defeater mechanisms, and support for reflective practice -- that can help maintain domain-specific autonomy while leveraging AI capabilities. This framework provides concrete guidance for developing AI systems that enhance rather than diminish human agency within specialized domains of action.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.

Builds on

23 of 93 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  2. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  4. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  5. 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
  6. 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 148
  7. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  8. 2018Abstracting Causal Modelscited by 107
  9. 2022The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3cited by 105
  10. 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
  11. 2023Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanationscited by 83
  12. 2023Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Supportcited by 75
11 more
  1. 2023Knowing About Knowing: An Illusion of Human Competence Can Hinder Appropriate Reliance on AI Systemscited by 41
  2. 2023Assessing LLMs for Moral Value Pluralismcited by 34
  3. 2021User Tampering in Reinforcement Learning Recommender Systemscited by 23
  4. 2022A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AIcited by 20
  5. 2024Exploring a Behavioral Model of "Positive Friction" in Human-AI Interactioncited by 9
  6. 2022AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomycited by 5
  7. 2022Legitimacy, Authority, and Democratic Duties of Explanationcited by 4
  8. 2024Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 4
  9. 2025RAIL in the Wild: Operationalizing Responsible AI Evaluation Using Anthropic's Value Datasetcited by 3
  10. 2022A Value-Centered Exploration of Data Privacy and Personalized Privacy Assistantscited by 1
  11. 2025An AI-Powered Research Assistant in the Lab: A Practical Guide for Text Analysis Through Iterative Collaboration with LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.