mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

One-Eval: An Agentic System for Automated and Traceable LLM Evaluation

arXiv 2603.09821 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable evaluation is essential for developing and deploying large language models, yet in practice it often requires substantial manual effort: practitioners must identify appropriate benchmarks, reproduce heterogeneous evaluation codebases, configure dataset schema mappings, and interpret aggregated metrics. To address these challenges, we present One-Eval, an agentic evaluation system that converts natural-language evaluation requests into executable, traceable, and customizable evaluation workflows. One-Eval integrates (i) NL2Bench for intent structuring and personalized benchmark planning, (ii) BenchResolve for benchmark resolution, automatic dataset acquisition, and schema normalization to ensure executability, and (iii) Metrics & Reporting for task-aware metric selection and decision-oriented reporting beyond scalar scores. The system further incorporates human-in-the-loop checkpoints for review, editing, and rollback, while preserving sample evidence trails for debugging and auditability. Experiments show that One-Eval can execute end-to-end evaluations from diverse natural-language requests with minimal user effort, supporting more efficient and reproducible evaluation in industrial settings. Our framework is publicly available at https://github.com/OpenDCAI/One-Eval.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 12 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  7. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  8. 2025Towards Engineering Multi-Agent LLMs: A Protocol-Driven Approachcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate
  2. 2025RocketEval: Efficient Automated LLM Evaluation via Grading Checklist
  3. 2024Evaluation-Driven Development and Operations of LLM Agents: A Process Model and Reference Architecture
  4. 2024UltraEval: A Lightweight Platform for Flexible and Comprehensive Evaluation for LLMs
  5. 2023AgentSims: An Open-Source Sandbox for Large Language Model Evaluation
  6. 2026UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities
  7. 2026Auditing Automated Evaluation, Error Propagation, and Runtime Mitigation in Tool-Using Language Agents
  8. 2024ChainBuddy: An AI Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines