Bridging Domain Expertise and Generalization for Performance Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance estimation under distribution shift aims to predict how a model behaves on an unlabeled test set whose distribution differs from the training data, a scenario that requires reliable indicators that can faithfully reflect model behavior without ground-truth labels. Existing approaches rely solely on the outputs of the given model whose biases are amplified once the distribution shifts, weakening the correlation with the true performance. Motivated by this limitation, we propose Fused Reference Alignment Prediction (FRAP), which leverages the complementary strengths of an external foundation model and the base model to construct a more reliable surrogate of the ground-truth labels. FRAP aligns the prediction distribution of the foundation model with that of the base model by applying temperature-scaled calibration that minimizes their divergence. The aligned predictions are fused through confidence-based weighting into a refined reference distribution that integrates robustness from the foundation model and domain-specific expertise from the base model, and performance estimation is obtained by measuring how closely the base model predictions agree with this reference. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets and architectures show that FRAP provides consistent and substantial improvements over representative performance-estimation methods under distribution shift.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
48 of 64 references.
References · 48
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
36 more
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 600
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
- 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 220
- 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 200
- 2020BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 155
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
- 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 138
- 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 117
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
- 2020Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 88
- 2019Cold Case: The Lost MNIST Digitscited by 62
- 2022Confidence Score for Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 59
- 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 57
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2024A Closer Look at the Robustness of Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training (CLIP)cited by 44
- 2025Model Adaptation: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 34
- 2024The Entropy Enigma: Success and Failure of Entropy Minimizationcited by 24
- 2023Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimationcited by 22
- 2024Proxy Denoising for Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 21
- 2023Characterizing Out-of-Distribution Error via Optimal Transportcited by 20
- 2023(Almost) Provable Error Bounds Under Distribution Shift via Disagreement Discrepancycited by 16
- 2023On the Importance of Feature Separability in Predicting Out-Of-Distribution Errorcited by 15
- 2023Distance Matters For Improving Performance Estimation Under Covariate Shiftcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.