mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Visual Spatial Planning from Symbolic State via Modality-Gap-Aware Self-Distillation

arXiv 2606.06076 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While Vision-Language Models excel at general multimodal understanding, they still struggle with visual spatial planning. We attribute this limitation to a perception--reasoning modality gap. Visual planning requires models to infer latent state structures from pixels and then reason over the recovered structure to produce valid actions, whereas symbolic planning directly leverages explicit representation. This discrepancy introduces two sequential bottlenecks: visual state recovery at the perception stage and multi-step planning at the reasoning stage. To address this, we propose MGSD, a two-stage modality-gap-aware self-distillation framework. First, a cold-start grounding stage establishes reliable visual state recovery before on-policy training. Second, a symbol-guided on-policy self-distillation stage transfers the privileged teacher's planning behavior to the student through token-level supervision on student-generated prefixes. Crucially, symbolic information is used only during training, while inference relies exclusively on visual inputs. Experiments on visual planning benchmarks show that MGSD consistently improves performance across different model scales, raising the macro average by 19.3% and 18.4%, respectively. The resulting models substantially reduce the gap to the upper bounds obtained with symbolic inputs. Ablation studies and diagnostic analyses further confirm that the gains arise from improvements in both visual state recovery and optimal-path reasoning. These results demonstrate that MGSD strengthens not only the recovery of actionable states from visual observations but also the ability to plan over the inferred structures. Code is available at https://github.com/Oranger-l/MGSD.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

25 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Improving Vision-language Models with Perception-centric Process Reward Models27 Apr
  2. 2025VOLD: Reasoning Transfer from LLMs to Vision-Language Models via On-Policy Distillation27 Oct
  3. 2025Simulation to Rules: A Dual-VLM Framework for Formal Visual Planning3 Oct
  4. 2025ViPlan: A Benchmark for Visual Planning with Symbolic Predicates and Vision-Language Models19 May
  5. 2025OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles21 Mar
  6. 2025Planning with Vision-Language Models and a Use Case in Robot-Assisted Teaching29 Jan
  7. 2024VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs2 Jul

Other references · 18

  1. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  2. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  3. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 939
  4. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
  5. 2024Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 280
  6. 2025Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thoughtcited by 206
  7. 2025Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontierscited by 199
  8. 2026Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixescited by 145
  9. 2025Visual Planning: Let's Think Only with Imagescited by 85
  10. 2026Vision-OPD: Learning to See Fine Details for Multimodal LLMs via On-Policy Self-Distillationcited by 77
  11. 2025Thinking with Generated Imagescited by 73
  12. 2026MIRAGE: The Illusion of Visual Understandingcited by 65
6 more
  1. 2025AlphaMaze: Enhancing Large Language Models' Spatial Intelligence via GRPOcited by 33
  2. 2023A Configurable Library for Generating and Manipulating Maze Datasetscited by 31
  3. 2023Mini-BEHAVIOR: A Procedurally Generated Benchmark for Long-horizon Decision-Making in Embodied AIcited by 23
  4. 2026KVPO: ODE-Native GRPO for Autoregressive Video Alignment via KV Semantic Explorationcited by 11
  5. 2026LatentUM: Unleashing the Potential of Interleaved Cross-Modal Reasoning via a Latent-Space Unified Modelcited by 8
  6. 2026When Should the Teacher Move? Temporal Coupling and Stability in Self On-Policy Distillationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Learning Concept-Based Causal Transition and Symbolic Reasoning for Visual Planning
  2. 2026Rule-Compliant Visual Spatial Planning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2026Resolving State-Representation Mismatch: State-Space Visual Reasoning for Open-Loop VLA Planning
  4. 2026Bridging Learned Visual Perception and Symbolic Belief-Space Planning
  5. 2024Can-Do! A Dataset and Neuro-Symbolic Grounded Framework for Embodied Planning with Large Multimodal Models
  6. 2026Plan-Bench: Can Existing VLMs Go Well Beyond Perception to Reason and Plan in Embodied Worlds?
  7. 2026Visual-OPSD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Unified Multimodal Reasoning
  8. 2026From Perception to Planning: Evolving Ego-Centric Task-Oriented Spatiotemporal Reasoning via Curriculum Learning