mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Aggregating LLM-Based Weak Verifiers for Spatial Layout Generation

arXiv 2606.05268 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.GR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a pipeline for building and aggregating task-specific, LLM-generated weak (imperfect) verifiers into a strong verifier for spatial layout domains. Given a task description, our pipeline asks an LLM to synthesize a collection of verifier programs using a layout verification DSL. Each individual LLM-generated verifier usually provides an imperfect check for a match between the layout and the corresponding task description. We show that by aggregating the responses of many such verifiers we can produce a stronger verifier. Moreover, by applying techniques from weak learning, our pipeline can learn how to aggregate the weak verifiers from a very sparse set of human labeled example layouts (about 10). We find that the strong verifiers produced by our pipeline outperform the status-quo approach of using a set of LLM judges to directly check whether a layout matches a task description, raising F1-scores by up to 7X across a variety of 3D room layout and 2D poster design tasks. We also demonstrate that verifier-guided layout generation using natural language feedback from our strong verifiers improves layout quality of a base layout generator by up to 66.2% according to a human evaluator.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 98 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  3. 2023LayoutGPT: Compositional Visual Planning and Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 347
  4. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  5. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
  6. 2024GALA3D: Towards Text-to-3D Complex Scene Generation via Layout-guided Generative Gaussian Splattingcited by 109
  7. 2024TICKing All the Boxes: Generated Checklists Improve LLM Evaluation and Generationcited by 68
  8. 2026Vision-as-Inverse-Graphics Agent via Interleaved Multimodal Reasoningcited by 49
  9. 2026SceneSmith: Agentic Generation of Simulation-Ready Indoor Scenescited by 46
  10. 2024BlenderLLM: Training Large Language Models for Computer-Aided Design with Self-improvementcited by 29
  11. 2025ArtiScene: Language-Driven Artistic 3D Scene Generation Through Image Intermediarycited by 28
  12. 2025iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMscited by 25
5 more
  1. 2025FlairGPT: Repurposing LLMs for Interior Designscited by 24
  2. 2025Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifierscited by 24
  3. 2024Robust Planning with Compound LLM Architectures: An LLM-Modulo Approachcited by 9
  4. 2026Do 3D Large Language Models Really Understand 3D Spatial Relationships?cited by 9
  5. 2024TextLap: Customizing Language Models for Text-to-Layout Planningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.