mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Generalization in Topology Optimization via Sensitivity-Conditioned Bernoulli Flow Matching

arXiv 2606.02179 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CEcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Surrogate models for topology optimization (TO) exhibit highly variable out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization under distribution shifts such as changing loads or boundary conditions, yet the source of this variability remains unclear. We hypothesize that OOD performance is governed by how much information the conditioning signal preserves about the adjoint sensitivity (reduced gradient) that drives classical TO. Modeling the TO pipeline as a causal Markov chain, the Data Processing Inequality establishes that, under this abstraction, the sensitivity field is an information-theoretically optimal conditioning signal for topology prediction. However, computing exact adjoint sensitivities can be expensive or unavailable in practice; we observe that certain physical fields can approximate sensitivities through monotone transformations. To formalize this, we introduce pseudo-sensitivities to characterize which fields enable generalization versus those that are information-poor. We then show that a sensitivity-conditioned Bernoulli flow-matching generator empirically confirms these predictions: conditioning on sensitivities yields state-of-the-art OOD performance, while increasingly distant physical fields degrade toward raw parameter conditioning. Results hold across structural TO benchmarks under load shifts and our new CFD-TO dataset under boundary-condition shifts such as multi-outlet configurations. Code and datasets are available at https://tum-pbs.github.io/topotransformer/ .

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  2. 2022Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Topology Optimization20 Aug

Other references · 14

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  3. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  4. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
  5. 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,761
  6. 2021Structured Denoising Diffusion Models in Discrete State-Spacescited by 1,719
  7. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  8. 2021Argmax Flows and Multinomial Diffusion: Learning Categorical Distributionscited by 574
  9. 2022Neighborhood Attention Transformercited by 239
  10. 2020TopologyGAN: Topology Optimization Using Generative Adversarial Networks Based on Physical Fields Over the Initial Domaincited by 65
  11. 2024U-DiTs: Downsample Tokens in U-Shaped Diffusion Transformerscited by 54
  12. 2017Neural networks for topology optimizationcited by 39
2 more
  1. 2025PDE-Transformer: Efficient and Versatile Transformers for Physics Simulationscited by 32
  2. 2023Diffusing the Optimal Topology: A Generative Optimization Approachcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Censored Sampling for Topology Design: Guiding Diffusion with Human Preferences
  2. 2023Aligning Optimization Trajectories with Diffusion Models for Constrained Design Generation
  3. 2026How the Classical Baseline Shapes Machine-Learning Speed Claims in Topology Optimization
  4. 2026TopoEdit: Fast Post-Optimization Editing of Topology Optimized Structures
  5. 2026TopoCtrl: Post-Optimization Topology Editing Toward Target Structural Characteristics ↗
  6. 2025Optimize Any Topology: A Foundation Model for Shape- and Resolution-Free Structural Topology Optimization
  7. 2026Manifold Drift in Flow Preference Optimization: A Root Cause of Reward Hacking
  8. 2025On the continuity of flows