Adversarial Agents on Topology Optimization: Understanding the Fragility and Robustness of Deep Learning-based and Physics-Based Design Models under Adversarial Perturbation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Topology optimization, using both physic-based approaches and deep learning surrogates, serves as a cornerstone for generative design agents in cyber-manufacturing systems. While deep learning surrogates have gained widespread adoption due to their speed in online design generation, this work demonstrates their vulnerability under input perturbations. In this work, we present a mechanics-grounded reliability evaluation framework that formulates an adversarial agent targeting the generative design models. We investigate a strictly non-intrusive threat model where bounded perturbations are introduced exclusively to the initial-density channel, while physical boundary conditions, compliance-gradient channels, network architectures, and solver routines remain intact. Evaluating surrogate models across U-Net, convolutional, and generative architectures with varying physics-gradient conditioning depths demonstrates that bounded initialization noise can cause catastrophic mechanical failure, increasing compliance by multiple orders of magnitude through severed load paths and disconnected supports. Furthermore, we discover that incorporating richer physics-gradient conditioning in the deep learning surrogates does not guarantee monotonic robustness across surrogate families. Finally, physics-in-the-loop recovery demonstrates that initializing the classical SIMP optimizer with perturbed topologies mitigates design performance degradation, having a high probability of restoring compliance to near-baseline levels across tested instances. These findings demonstrate that learned surrogates should serve as physics-verified initializers instead of replacing physics-based solvers entirely in a resilient cyber-manufacturing system. Moreover, the proposed adversarial agent provides a foundation for future training generative design agents robust against noise and targeted perturbations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 37 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2022Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Topology Optimizationcited by 79
- 2020TopologyGAN: Topology Optimization Using Generative Adversarial Networks Based on Physical Fields Over the Initial Domaincited by 65
- 2018Deep learning for determining a near-optimal topological design without any iterationcited by 40
- 2017Neural networks for topology optimizationcited by 39
- 2022On the use of Artificial Neural Networks in Topology Optimisationcited by 36
- 2019A Novel Topology Optimization Approach using Conditional Deep Learningcited by 18
- 2024Neural topology optimization: the good, the bad, and the uglycited by 10
- 2023Latent Diffusion Models for Structural Component Designcited by 5
- 2026On the Generalization in Topology Optimization via Sensitivity-Conditioned Bernoulli Flow Matchingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.