mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From "Weak" Signals to Strong Models: Preference Delta Aggregation with LoRA Merging

arXiv 2606.00357 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Training strong large language models (LLMs) requires high-quality supervision, which is often scarce. Recent work shows that paired preference data from weak-weaker model pairs (e.g., Qwen3 4B over 1.7B), despite the limited quality of individual responses, can provide an effective supervision signal through relative quality deltas, which we term a "weak" signal. This motivates a key research question: can multiple "weak" signals be constructively aggregated for improving strong models (e.g., Qwen3 8B)? To this end, we propose Preference Delta Aggregation (PDA), the first framework that derives a preference delta from each weak-weaker model pair, instantiates it as a LoRA adapter learned through preference optimization, and aggregates the resulting deltas via LoRA merging. To further mitigate directional interference during LoRA merging, we introduce Geometric Alignment Merging (GAM), a geometry-aware merging method that aligns adapter subspaces before aggregation, enabling more robust composition of diverse deltas. Evaluations on knowledge reasoning and agentic search benchmarks show that aggregating multiple "weak" signals pushes performance beyond any single signal, with further gains as additional signals are incorporated. Correspondingly, PDA with GAM improves the strong model by 6.8 and 7.3 points on average for knowledge reasoning and agentic search, respectively. It outperforms all single-delta and multi-delta baselines, exceeding the best single-delta baseline by 2.1 and 4.3 points. Further analysis attributes these gains to the effective composition of complementary capabilities encoded across distinct preference deltas.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 42 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

42 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Weak-to-Strong Preference Optimization: Stealing Reward from Weak Aligned Model24 Oct
  2. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 39

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  9. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  10. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  11. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  12. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,282
27 more
  1. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  2. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  3. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
  4. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  5. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  6. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
  7. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  8. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
  9. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  10. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 467
  11. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 387
  12. 2023LoraHub: Efficient Cross-Task Generalization via Dynamic LoRA Compositioncited by 364
  13. 2025ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searchingcited by 208
  14. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
  15. 2024Model merging with SVD to tie the Knotscited by 122
  16. 2024Continual Learning and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 77
  17. 2024The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Easy Training Data for Hard Taskscited by 40
  18. 2025ToolMind Technical Report: A Large-Scale, Reasoning-Enhanced Tool-Use Datasetcited by 30
  19. 2025The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gainscited by 28
  20. 2025Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspectivecited by 23
  21. 2024HRLAIF: Improvements in Helpfulness and Harmlessness in Open-domain Reinforcement Learning From AI Feedbackcited by 15
  22. 2025MRMR: A Realistic and Expert-Level Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Multimodal Retrievalcited by 12
  23. 2025Mapping Post-Training Forgetting in Language Models at Scalecited by 11
  24. 2025AceSearcher: Bootstrapping Reasoning and Search for LLMs via Reinforced Self-Playcited by 10
  25. 2024Varying Shades of Wrong: Aligning LLMs with Wrong Answers Onlycited by 9
  26. 2025Beneficial Reasoning Behaviors in Agentic Search and Effective Post-training to Obtain Themcited by 7
  27. 2025Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Failure Trajectories: A Tree-based Approach to Elicit Optimal Policy in Strong Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning Preferences
  2. 2026Learning Where It Matters: Geometric Anchoring for Robust Preference Alignment
  3. 2024A Deep Dive into the Trade-Offs of Parameter-Efficient Preference Alignment Techniques
  4. 2025PITA: Preference-Guided Inference-Time Alignment for LLM Post-Training
  5. 2025Well Begun is Half Done: Low-resource Preference Alignment by Weak-to-Strong Decoding
  6. 2026When Weak LLMs Speak with Confidence, Preference Alignment Gets Stronger
  7. 2024Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization
  8. 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey