Learning Where It Matters: Geometric Anchoring for Robust Preference Alignment
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and related methods align large language models from pairwise preferences by regularizing updates against a fixed reference policy. As the policy drifts, a static reference, however, can become increasingly miscalibrated, leading to distributional mismatch and amplifying spurious preference signals under noisy supervision. Conversely, reference-free variants avoid mismatch but often suffer from unconstrained reward drift. We propose Geometric Anchor Preference Optimization (GAPO), which replaces the fixed reference with a dynamic, geometry-aware anchor: an adversarial local perturbation of the current policy within a small radius that serves as a pessimistic baseline. This anchor enables an adaptive reweighting mechanism, modulating the importance of each preference pair based on its local sensitivity. We further introduce the Anchor Gap, the reward discrepancy between the policy and its anchor, and show under smoothness conditions that it approximates worst-case local margin degradation. Optimizing a logistic objective weighted by this gap downweights geometrically brittle instances while emphasizing robust preference signals. Across diverse noise settings, GAPO consistently improves robustness while matching or improving performance on standard LLM alignment and reasoning benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
26 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization14 Oct
- 2024Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization10 Jul
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
- 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization2 Feb
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023Language Model Alignment with Elastic Reset6 Dec
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHF12 Sep
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 350
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 289
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AAPA: Adversarially Anchored Preference Alignment for Post-Training of Large Language Models
- 2025Robust Preference Alignment via Directional Neighborhood Consensus
- 2026Mitigating Mismatch within Reference-based Preference Optimization
- 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Alignment Algorithms in Language Models
- 2026Small-Margin Preferences Still Matter-If You Train Them Right
- 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
- 2026How Sampling Shapes LLM Alignment: From One-Shot Optima to Iterative Dynamics
- 2026Mind the Gap: Structure-Aware Consistency in Preference Learning