mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PITA: Preference-Guided Inference-Time Alignment for LLM Post-Training

arXiv 2507.20067 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Inference-time alignment enables large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs aligned with end-user preferences without further training. Recent post-training methods achieve this by using small guidance models to modify token generation during inference. These methods typically optimize a reward function KL-regularized by the original LLM taken as the reference policy. A critical limitation, however, is their dependence on a pre-trained reward model, which requires fitting to human preference feedback--a potentially unstable process. In contrast, we introduce PITA, a novel framework that integrates preference feedback directly into the LLM's token generation, eliminating the need for a reward model. PITA learns a small preference-based guidance policy to modify token probabilities at inference time without LLM fine-tuning, reducing computational cost and bypassing the pre-trained reward model dependency. The problem is framed as identifying an underlying preference distribution, solved through stochastic search and iterative refinement of the preference-based guidance model. We evaluate PITA across diverse tasks, including mathematical reasoning and sentiment classification, demonstrating its effectiveness in aligning LLM outputs with user preferences.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 44 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2025.

Builds on

44 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TreeBoN: Enhancing Inference-Time Alignment with Speculative Tree-Search and Best-of-N Sampling18 Oct
  2. 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalization10 May
  3. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  4. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 39

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  8. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  9. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  10. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  11. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  12. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
27 more
  1. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  2. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  3. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  4. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
  5. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  6. 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
  7. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
  8. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
  9. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
  10. 2023Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Trainingcited by 291
  11. 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisonscited by 244
  12. 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 244
  13. 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 194
  14. 2023Planning with Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 179
  15. 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 156
  16. 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Modelscited by 133
  17. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
  18. 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 105
  19. 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 78
  20. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RLcited by 77
  21. 2015Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependencecited by 59
  22. 2023Don't throw away your value model! Generating more preferable text with Value-Guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search decodingcited by 59
  23. 2022Models of human preference for learning reward functionscited by 54
  24. 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Modelcited by 52
  25. 2023KCTS: Knowledge-Constrained Tree Search Decoding with Token-Level Hallucination Detectioncited by 43
  26. 2018Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 21
  27. 2025Qsharp: Provably Optimal Distributional RL for LLM Post-Trainingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Inference time LLM alignment in single and multidomain preference spectrum
  2. 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
  3. 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
  4. 2025From Outcomes to Processes: Guiding PRM Learning from ORM for Inference-Time Alignment
  5. 2025Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization
  6. 2024Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes
  7. 2026When Weak LLMs Speak with Confidence, Preference Alignment Gets Stronger
  8. 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs