PITA: Preference-Guided Inference-Time Alignment for LLM Post-Training
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Inference-time alignment enables large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs aligned with end-user preferences without further training. Recent post-training methods achieve this by using small guidance models to modify token generation during inference. These methods typically optimize a reward function KL-regularized by the original LLM taken as the reference policy. A critical limitation, however, is their dependence on a pre-trained reward model, which requires fitting to human preference feedback--a potentially unstable process. In contrast, we introduce PITA, a novel framework that integrates preference feedback directly into the LLM's token generation, eliminating the need for a reward model. PITA learns a small preference-based guidance policy to modify token probabilities at inference time without LLM fine-tuning, reducing computational cost and bypassing the pre-trained reward model dependency. The problem is framed as identifying an underlying preference distribution, solved through stochastic search and iterative refinement of the preference-based guidance model. We evaluate PITA across diverse tasks, including mathematical reasoning and sentiment classification, demonstrating its effectiveness in aligning LLM outputs with user preferences.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 44 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2025.
Builds on
44 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024TreeBoN: Enhancing Inference-Time Alignment with Speculative Tree-Search and Best-of-N Sampling18 Oct
- 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalization10 May
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 39
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
27 more
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
- 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
- 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Searchcited by 338
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 325
- 2023Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Trainingcited by 291
- 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisonscited by 244
- 2024Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimizationcited by 244
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 194
- 2023Planning with Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 179
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 156
- 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Modelscited by 133
- 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
- 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 105
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 78
- 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RLcited by 77
- 2015Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependencecited by 59
- 2023Don't throw away your value model! Generating more preferable text with Value-Guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search decodingcited by 59
- 2022Models of human preference for learning reward functionscited by 54
- 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Modelcited by 52
- 2023KCTS: Knowledge-Constrained Tree Search Decoding with Token-Level Hallucination Detectioncited by 43
- 2018Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 21
- 2025Qsharp: Provably Optimal Distributional RL for LLM Post-Trainingcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Inference time LLM alignment in single and multidomain preference spectrum
- 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignment
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2025From Outcomes to Processes: Guiding PRM Learning from ORM for Inference-Time Alignment
- 2025Not All Preferences are What You Need for Post-Training: Selective Alignment Strategy for Preference Optimization
- 2024Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes
- 2026When Weak LLMs Speak with Confidence, Preference Alignment Gets Stronger
- 2024Panacea: Pareto Alignment via Preference Adaptation for LLMs