mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Developing an AI-Powered UX Research Point of View for Digital Health in A Regulatory Context: An Exemplar Case from MSM and Transgender HIV Care in Nigeria

arXiv 2605.31138 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

User Experience Research (UXR) in a legal and regulatory contexts presents unique challenges that require specialised approaches to protect vulnerable populations whilst generating actionable insights. Digital consultation, appointment booking, and medication delivery platforms show promise for extending care access; however, their real-world effectiveness is curtailed by an absence of theoretically grounded user experience research (UXR) methodologies that adequately account for the psychosocial conditions of these populations. This paper introduces a Generative AI-augmented UXR methodology, grounded in the UXR Point of View (PoV) Playbook, to guide the design of psychologically safe, low-cognitive-load digital health interventions for MSM and transgender individuals living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria. Drawing from empirical research involving co-design workshops, thematic analysis, and requirements engineering, the methodology is operationalised through a four-stage UXR process encompassing AI-supported hypothesis generation, foundational planning, insight generation via Building Blocks, and the construction of stakeholder-specific PoV narratives. This process results in ten theory-informed UXR Play Cards that translate psychological mechanisms and empirical findings into actionable design guidance. Each play contains actionable tasks, AI-augmented approaches, and ethical guardrails tailored for research with marginalised populations. The output is a set of ten theory-informed UXR Play Cards translating psychological insight and empirical evidence into actionable design guidance. The core contribution is a replicable, stigma-aware, and privacy-centred framework for responsible GenAI use in UXR practice, advancing human-centred digital health design for marginalised communities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

4 of 17 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183
  2. 2024Towards Standardizing AI Bias Explorationcited by 5
  3. 2025Human-Centred AI in FinTech: Developing a User Experience (UX) Research Point of View (PoV) Playbookcited by 3
  4. 2025Development of a persuasive User Experience Research (UXR) Point of View for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Prompt template for a fictitious LLM agent in a content-flagging experiment ↗
  2. 2026Surfacing and Applying Meaning: Supporting Hermeneutical Autonomy for LGBTQ+ People in Taiwan ↗
  3. 2026Designing Around Stigma: Human-Centered LLMs for Menstrual Health ↗
  4. 2026COACH meets QUORUM: A Framework and Pipeline for Aligning User, Expert and Developer Perspectives in LLM-generated Health Counselling
  5. 2026Mapping the Design Space of User Experience for Computer Use Agents
  6. 2025Evaluating the Bias in LLMs for Surveying Opinion and Decision Making in Healthcare
  7. 2025Envisioning an AI-Enhanced Mental Health Ecosystem
  8. 2026A Framework of User Experience Principles for Human-AI Agent Interaction in the Workplace