mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Standardizing AI Bias Exploration

arXiv 2405.19022 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.LG cs.CY cs.HCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Creating fair AI systems is a complex problem that involves the assessment of context-dependent bias concerns. Existing research and programming libraries express specific concerns as measures of bias that they aim to constrain or mitigate. In practice, one should explore a wide variety of (sometimes incompatible) measures before deciding which ones warrant corrective action, but their narrow scope means that most new situations can only be examined after devising new measures. In this work, we present a mathematical framework that distils literature measures of bias into building blocks, hereby facilitating new combinations to cover a wide range of fairness concerns, such as classification or recommendation differences across multiple multi-value sensitive attributes (e.g., many genders and races, and their intersections). We show how this framework generalizes existing concepts and present frequently used blocks. We provide an open-source implementation of our framework as a Python library, called FairBench, that facilitates systematic and extensible exploration of potential bias concerns.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

26 of 47 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  5. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  7. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  8. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  9. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  10. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  11. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  12. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
14 more
  1. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
  2. 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
  3. 2021Subgroup Generalization and Fairness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 69
  4. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  5. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  6. 2021Fairness in Ranking: A Surveycited by 33
  7. 2022On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple Subgroupscited by 31
  8. 2022The four-fifths rule is not disparate impact: a woeful tale of epistemic trespassing in algorithmic fairnesscited by 21
  9. 2023FLAC: Fairness-Aware Representation Learning by Suppressing Attribute-Class Associationscited by 18
  10. 2019Preference-Informed Fairnesscited by 15
  11. 2022Counterfactual Fairness Is Basically Demographic Paritycited by 15
  12. 2023Multi-dimensional discrimination in Law and Machine Learning -- A comparative overviewcited by 15
  13. 2017The impossibility of "fairness": a generalized impossibility result for decisionscited by 12
  14. 2020EagerPy: Writing Code That Works Natively with PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX, and NumPycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.