Mapping the Design Space of User Experience for Computer Use Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → GUI and mobile agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM)-based computer use agents execute user commands by interacting with available UI elements, but little is known about how users want to interact with these agents or what design factors matter for their user experience (UX). We conducted a two-phase study to map the UX design space for computer use agents. In Phase 1, we reviewed existing systems to develop a taxonomy of UX considerations, then refined it through interviews with eight UX and AI practitioners. The resulting taxonomy included categories such as user prompts, explainability, user control, and users' mental models, with corresponding subcategories and example design features. In Phase 2, we ran a Wizard-of-Oz study with 20 participants, where a researcher acted as a web-based computer use agent and probed user reactions during normal, error-prone and risky execution. We used the findings to validate the taxonomy from Phase 1 and deepen our understand of the design space by identifying the connections between design areas and divergence in user needs and scenarios. Our taxonomy and empirical insights provide a map for developers to consider different aspects of user experience in computer use agent design and to situate their designs within users' diverse needs and scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Understanding User Experiences of Computer Use Agents: Design Space and Opportunities for Building Agent UX Prototypes6 Oct
- 2025A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agents27 Mar
- 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents21 Jan
- 2024AutoGLM: Autonomous Foundation Agents for GUIs28 Oct
- 2024From Interaction to Impact: Towards Safer AI Agents Through Understanding and Evaluating Mobile UI Operation Impacts11 Oct
Other references · 16
- 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
- 2023AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Androidcited by 178
- 2024Ferret-UI: Grounded Mobile UI Understanding with Multimodal LLMscited by 173
- 2022Spotlight: Mobile UI Understanding using Vision-Language Models with a Focuscited by 62
- 2024Design Principles for Generative AI Applicationscited by 57
- 2025Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistantcited by 54
- 2024Ferret-UI 2: Mastering Universal User Interface Understanding Across Platformscited by 51
- 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agentscited by 45
- 2025Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systemscited by 41
- 2024Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agentscited by 38
- 2025CowPilot: A Framework for Autonomous and Human-Agent Collaborative Web Navigationcited by 35
- 2023AXNav: Replaying Accessibility Tests from Natural Languagecited by 31
4 more
- 2022Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AIcited by 20
- 2023ILuvUI: Instruction-tuned LangUage-Vision modeling of UIs from Machine Conversationscited by 17
- 2022Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarizationcited by 15
- 2023Voicify Your UI: Towards Android App Control with Voice Commandscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safetycited by 2
- 2026"When to Hand Off, When to Work Together": Understanding Concurrent Human-Agent Interaction in Shared Co-Creative Workspacescited by 1
- 2026AgentLens: Adaptive Visual Modalities for Human-Agent Interaction in Mobile GUI Agentscited by 1
- 2026PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026"Zooming In" on Agentic Web Browsers as Assistive Technologies: A Case Study with a Low-Vision Technology Expertcited by 0
- 2026Sidekick: Designing Communication for Effective Multitasking with Computer Use Agentscited by 0
- 2026Value-Sensitive Delegation in Everyday AI Agent Use: Evidence from OpenClawcited by 0
- 2026Value-Sensitive Delegation in Everyday AI Agent Use: Evidence from OpenClaw18 Sep 2026
- 2026Sidekick: Designing Communication for Effective Multitasking with Computer Use Agents20 Jul 2026
- 2026"Zooming In" on Agentic Web Browsers as Assistive Technologies: A Case Study with a Low-Vision Technology Expert23 Jun 2026
- 2026PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluation4 Jun 2026
- 2026AgentLens: Adaptive Visual Modalities for Human-Agent Interaction in Mobile GUI Agents22 Apr 2026
- 2026Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety18 Mar 2026
- 2026"When to Hand Off, When to Work Together": Understanding Concurrent Human-Agent Interaction in Shared Co-Creative Workspaces2 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026From SERPs to Agents: A Platform for Comparative Studies of Information Interaction
- 2026A Framework of User Experience Principles for Human-AI Agent Interaction in the Workplace
- 2026Augmenting Interface Usability Heuristics for Reliable Computer-Use Agents
- 2026Affora: A Design System for Agent-Friendly Interfaces
- 2026UXCascade: Scalable Usability Testing with Simulated User Agents
- 2025Do MLLMs Capture How Interfaces Guide User Behavior? A Benchmark for Multimodal UI/UX Design Understanding
- 2026UXSim: Towards a Hybrid User Search Simulation
- 2026PrefIx: Understand and Adapt to User Preference in Human-Agent Interaction