COACH meets QUORUM: A Framework and Pipeline for Aligning User, Expert and Developer Perspectives in LLM-generated Health Counselling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Systems that collect data on sleep, mood, and activities can provide valuable lifestyle counselling to populations affected by chronic disease and its consequences. Such systems are, however, challenging to develop; besides reliably extracting patterns from user-specific data, systems should also contextualise these patterns with validated medical knowledge to ensure the quality of counselling, and generate counselling that is relevant to a real user. We present QUORUM, a new evaluation framework that unifies these developer-, expert-, and user-centric perspectives, and show with a real case study that it meaningfully tracks convergence and divergence in stakeholder perspectives. We also present COACH, a Large Language Model-driven pipeline to generate personalised lifestyle counselling for our Healthy Chronos use case, a diary app for cancer patients and survivors. Applying our framework shows that overall, users, medical experts, and developers converge on the opinion that the generated counselling is relevant, of good quality, and reliable. However, stakeholders also diverge on the tone of the counselling, sensitivity to errors in pattern-extraction, and potential hallucinations. These findings highlight the importance of multi-stakeholder evaluation for consumer health language technologies and illustrate how a unified evaluation framework can support trustworthy, patient-centered NLP systems in real-world settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.
Builds on
11 of 36 references.
References · 11
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
- 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 159
- 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 106
- 2023Prompt Engineering for Healthcare: Methodologies and Applicationscited by 52
- 2023Tabular Representation, Noisy Operators, and Impacts on Table Structure Understanding Tasks in LLMscited by 49
- 2024Understanding User Experience in Large Language Model Interactionscited by 44
- 2024GPTCoach: Towards LLM-Based Physical Activity Coachingcited by 29
- 2024Virtual Agents for Alcohol Use Counseling: Exploring LLM-Powered Motivational Interviewingcited by 17
- 2024Fool Me, Fool Me: User Attitudes Toward LLM Falsehoodscited by 3
- 2025When LLMs Can't Help: Real-World Evaluation of LLMs in Nutritioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sleepless Nights, Sugary Days: Creating Synthetic Users with Health Conditions for Realistic Coaching Agent Interactions
- 2024Graph-Augmented LLMs for Personalized Health Insights: A Case Study in Sleep Analysis
- 2026Detecting Clinical Discrepancies in Health Coaching Agents: A Dual-Stream Memory and Reconciliation Architecture
- 2025The Anatomy of a Personal Health Agent
- 2026mind_call: A Dataset for Mental Health Function Calling with Large Language Models
- 2025CGM-Led Multimodal Tracking with Chatbot Support: An Autoethnography in Sub-Health ↗
- 2024From Barriers to Tactics: A Behavioral Science-Informed Agentic Workflow for Personalized Nutrition Coaching
- 2023From Classification to Clinical Insights: Towards Analyzing and Reasoning About Mobile and Behavioral Health Data With Large Language Models